Skip to content

Repository files navigation

Topological Quantum Computer: Fibonacci Anyon Model

release license status python lean safety

Staged research package for Fibonacci-anyon topological quantum computing, SHA-520 boundary analysis, and proof-directed search.

This is a mathematical formalization and simulation framework. Not a physical implementation. Not a claim that SHA is broken.


What This Is

A formal model of topological quantum computing using the Fibonacci anyon category (SU(2)_3 Chern-Simons theory), connected to a Q-Lambda reversible oracle compiler and resource estimation backend.

The central question: does a Fibonacci-anyon topological quantum computer provide practical advantage for SHA-style cryptanalysis?

Current answer: No. Generic SHA preimage search has no advantage beyond Grover-style square-root speedup. Reversible oracle costs, braid compilation overhead, coherence requirements, and error-correction costs dominate long before full-round attack relevance. The negative result is the contribution.


What Is Actually Built

Lean 4 Formalization

File What it proves
FibonacciAnyon.lean Fusion rules (tau x tau = 1 + tau), Fibonacci dimension counts, fusion theorem
LogicalQubits.lean Encoding definitions (3-tau, 4-tau), physical anyon accounting theorems
BraidCompilation.lean BraidOp structure, H/X/S/CNOT/CCX braid words, length theorems
QuantumGates.lean QIR gate enum, braid cost function, cost theorems
Main.lean Integration

All theorems compile. The braid universality (density) theorem is cited to Freedman-Larsen-Wang (2002) -- not proved in this repo.

Python

Module What it does
qlambda/compiler.py Full Q-Lambda lexer, parser, QIR synthesizer, uncompute pass
qlambda/arrays.py SHA-520 IV/K constants, falsification arrays, DSL primitives
qlambda/programs.py SHA-520-r Q-Lambda source programs
topological/braid_backend.py QIR-to-Fibonacci-braid gate compiler
topological/resource_estimates.py Anyon and braid resource estimates
quantum/quantum_sha520.py Reversible SHA-520 oracle construction
quantum/grover_sha520.py Grover search implementation
classical/sha520_ref.py SHA-520 reference (reduced-round)

Experiments

Four validation phases in experiments/:

  1. Classical validation -- SHA-520-r test vectors
  2. Quantum simulation -- reduced-round Grover (Qiskit Aer, optional)
  3. Resource validation -- estimated vs actual braid/anyon counts
  4. Topological compilation -- braid sequence generation (theory only)

Key Facts

Fibonacci anyon fusion:

tau x tau = 1 + tau
1 x tau   = tau
1 x 1     = 1

Quantum dimension of tau: phi = (1+sqrt(5))/2

Braid costs (QuantumGates.lean):

  • H: 5 braid ops
  • T: 300 braid ops (Solovay-Kitaev approximation)
  • CNOT: 5 braid ops
  • CCX (Toffoli): 16 braid ops

Cryptanalytic result: Grover search on SHA-520 requires 2^260 oracle calls. Topological compilation adds overhead, no asymptotic advantage. Full-round attack is physically impractical.


What This Does Not Claim

Claim Status
Fibonacci anyons physically exist UNPROVEN
Topological quantum computer can be built UNPROVEN
This breaks SHA-520 FALSE
All Lean proofs are closed NO -- universality cites external proof
This beats surface codes UNPROVEN

Falsification Criteria

Algorithm falsified if braid compilation overhead is superpolynomial in log(1/epsilon) or oracle cost dominates.

Architecture falsified if nu=12/5 FQH state not realized or interferometric visibility < 90%.

Status: all criteria open.


Running It

pip install -e .
python experiments/phase1_classical_validation.py
python experiments/phase2_quantum_simulation.py
python experiments/phase3_resource_validation.py
python experiments/phase4_topological_compilation.py
cd lean && lake build

Project Structure

topological-quantum-computer/
├── lean/                     # Lean 4 formal surfaces
│   ├── FibonacciAnyon.lean
│   ├── LogicalQubits.lean
│   ├── BraidCompilation.lean
│   ├── QuantumGates.lean
│   └── Main.lean
├── python/
│   ├── qlambda/              # Q-Lambda DSL + arrays + policy
│   ├── topological/          # QIR-to-braid backend
│   ├── classical/            # SHA-520 reference
│   ├── quantum/              # Reversible oracle + Grover
│   └── simulators/           # MPS + Qiskit
├── experiments/              # Four validation phases
├── docs/                     # Architecture, falsification, threat model
├── ABOUT.md
├── CODEX_AUDIT.md
└── LICENSE.tri

References

  • Kitaev, A. (2003). Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Annals of Physics.
  • Freedman, M. H.; Larsen, M. J.; Wang, Z. (2002). The two-eigenvalue problem and density of Jones representation of braid groups. Communications in Mathematical Physics.
  • Preskill, J. (2004). Lecture Notes on Topological Quantum Computation. Chapter 9.

Author

Ahmad Ali Parr -- design, architecture, mathematical foundation


License

Tri-license: BSL-1.1 / AGPL-3.0 / MPL-2.0. See LICENSE.tri.

No license path authorizes claims of physical hardware, full theorem closure, full-round SHA cryptanalysis, or key recovery.


Falsifiable by design. Honest by construction.