Update non-major dependencies to v9.30.1

[renovate]

• Remove SDK frames from current-thread stacktraces when the SDK is loaded from the SentryObjC framework or dylib (#​9286)

Summary

Updates the Sentry crash reporting and telemetry dependency (getsentry/sentry-cocoa) from version 9.30.0 to 9.30.1 across both dependency manifests used by the project. This is a Renovate-driven non-major dependency bump that keeps the SDK current with the latest patch release.

Changes

• Package.swift — Bumped the Swift Package Manager requirement for getsentry/sentry-cocoa from 9.30.0 to 9.30.1. This package feeds crash reporting and telemetry for the codecaps Sentry project (org simple-with-us) and remains aligned with the fleet-wide sentry-cocoa major version.
• ios/CodeCapsCompanion/project.yml — Bumped the equivalent Sentry package reference (XcodeGen configuration for the iOS companion app) from 9.30.0 to 9.30.1 so the iOS target resolves the same library version as the SwiftPM manifest.

Functional Impact

• No API or configuration changes are introduced; only the resolved dependency version changes.
• Both the macOS/SwiftPM side and the iOS companion app continue to use the same Sentry release line, preserving version consistency between targets.
• Consumers should receive any patch-level fixes included in 9.30.1 for crash reporting and telemetry.

Review Notes

• The automated review flagged one medium-severity finding: the task/PR description was deemed insufficient for business logic validation. Since this change only alters dependency version pins, the practical validation scope is limited to confirming the pinned versions match and that builds still resolve and link against 9.30.1.

[kody-ai]

Kody Review Complete

Great news! 🎉
No issues were found that match your current review configurations.

Keep up the excellent work! 🚀

⚠️ 2 Kody Rule(s) were not evaluated

These rules declare that they need repository context beyond this diff, and the review could not retrieve it, so they were not judged on this pull request:

• Never move or delete existing app support.html URLs
• Keep server secrets out of client bundles

Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration

Interacting with Kody

• Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the @kody start-review command at the root of your PR.

• Validate Business Logic: Ask Kody to validate your code against business rules by adding a comment with the @kody -v business-logic command.

• Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Current Kody Configuration

Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options	Enabled
Bug	✅
Performance	✅
Security	✅
Business Logic	✅

Access your configuration settings here.

​

[kody-ai]

🤔 Insufficient Task Context

I found a task linked to this PR, but it only contains minimal information (title only, no description or acceptance criteria). To perform a meaningful business rules validation, I need more details.

🔍 What I need to validate:

• Business requirements and acceptance criteria
• Expected behavior and business rules
• Edge cases and constraints to consider

💡 How to improve the task context:

• Add a description to the linked ticket
• Include acceptance criteria or business rules
• Describe the expected behavior after the change

⚠️ Important:

A task title alone is not sufficient to determine whether the implementation is correct or complete.

---

💡 This validation runs automatically only on the first review of a pull request. To run it again, comment @kody -v business-logic.