Skip to content

Fleet naming completion: retire agent-sync naming in dated docs + live runbook pointer - #1860

Merged
jaywedgeworth22 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
wise/fleet-naming-purge
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

jaywedgeworth22 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
wise/fleet-naming-purge

Conversation

@jaywedgeworth22

@jaywedgeworth22 jaywedgeworth22 commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR completes fleet naming by purging remaining agent-sync references from dated audit docs and updating the live incident runbook pointer. In docs/audits/2026-07-15-branch-dispositions.md, 2026-07-20-grok3-full-app-expert-review.md, 2026-08-17-backend-durability.md, and 2026-08-17-outcomes-projections.md, Slack #agent-sync / Agent Sync Relay / AGENT-SYNC.md wording is replaced with fleet-relay / fleet coordination channel / fleet handbook wording. In the live docs/runbooks/sqlite-data-loss-incident.md, the incident-active notification target is changed from Slack #agent-sync to Zulip #Work-In-Progress, which changes operator coordination behavior during SQLite data-loss response.

No source logic is changed; impact is documentation-only except for the runbook coordination pointer. No tests were added and no test runs, approvals, or runtime verification are reported, so behavior remains unverified. Unresolved risk per automated review: the 2026-07-15-branch-dispositions.md edit replaces the literal branch key for the coordination-stanza branch, breaking git traceability for that audit row (medium).

@kody-ai

kody-ai Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review Completed! 🔥

The code review was successfully completed based on your current configurations.

⚠️ 3 Kody Rule(s) were not evaluated

These rules declare that they need repository context beyond this diff, and the review could not retrieve it, so they were not judged on this pull request:

  • Verify the import graph before applying import 'server-only'
  • Configuration Helpers Must Be Side-Effect Free
  • Keep Numeric Representations Consistent Across Related Data Sources
Kody Guide: Usage and Configuration
Interacting with Kody
  • Request a Review: Ask Kody to review your PR manually by adding a comment with the @kody start-review command at the root of your PR.

  • Validate Business Logic: Ask Kody to validate your code against business rules by adding a comment with the @kody -v business-logic command.

  • Provide Feedback: Help Kody learn and improve by reacting to its comments with a 👍 for helpful suggestions or a 👎 if improvements are needed.

Current Kody Configuration
Review Options

The following review options are enabled or disabled:

Options Enabled
Bug ✅
Performance ✅
Security ✅
Business Logic ✅

Access your configuration settings here.

​

@jaywedgeworth22
jaywedgeworth22 merged commit f4b241d into main Nov 2, 2026
35 checks passed
@jaywedgeworth22
jaywedgeworth22 deleted the wise/fleet-naming-purge branch November 2, 2026 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant