CDA-74 Created ADR for timeseries csv formatting#1634
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See if you can improve the formatting of the numbering and add more sub section headers to break things up
i.e.
1) vs 1.
Might help in reading this visually when it is rendered!
Optional fix, not a blocker for me.
|
Updated formatting to be more readable. |
590a37c to
4581866
Compare
MikeNeilson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks reasonable to me.
Will let @krowvin give the final approval.
Co-authored-by: Mike Neilson <michael.a.neilson@usace.army.mil>
…, it breaks the standard of column to field naming used by jackson.
Co-authored-by: Adam Korynta <47677856+adamkorynta@users.noreply.github.com>
…not relying on indices for optional columns
Co-authored-by: Adam Korynta <47677856+adamkorynta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Korynta <47677856+adamkorynta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Korynta <47677856+adamkorynta@users.noreply.github.com>
…record definition
…made at this level
Co-authored-by: Adam Korynta <47677856+adamkorynta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Korynta <47677856+adamkorynta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Adam Korynta <47677856+adamkorynta@users.noreply.github.com>
90815a0 to
36035ea
Compare
MikeNeilson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is a good start. (NOTE: I mean that in since it's complete and we can go with it, but I'm sure we'll have to change something later... e.g. normal software development.)
I did just share this again with the more focus portion of the community of practice, so will give them a day or two to review, otherwise I would've marked approved.
|
@jeffsuperglide @rgoss @adamscarberry As y'all have or might work on A2W and likely don't get arbitrary notifications from CDA developement you might be interested and want to comment. We also have #1692 getting worked on so this should eventually replace the existing A2W CSV download. |
No description provided.