Skip to content

AsyncAPI 3.x: an E2E test, NCS driven through Kafka - #1760

Draft
LautaroPetaccio wants to merge 17 commits into
feature/asyncapi-examplesfrom
feature/asyncapi-e2e-kafka
Draft

LautaroPetaccio wants to merge 17 commits into
feature/asyncapi-examplesfrom
feature/asyncapi-e2e-kafka

Conversation

@LautaroPetaccio

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Fourteenth in the AsyncAPI stack, on top of #1754. Draft, like the three below it. This is the first search against a real broker, and the E2E test for_developers.md asks every feature to have.

The SUT — NCS over Kafka

The NCS case study re-expressed as a message-driven service: six request topics (ncs.<op>.request), each answered on a reply topic with a result message or, for the inputs the REST version answers with a 400, an error message — exactly what ncs-kafka.yaml (already in core's test resources) describes. The routines are ported from EMB's org.restncs.imp and cited at the top of each file; the rejection rules mirror NcsRest. A Spring Boot application with no web layer: it speaks only Kafka, which is the point.

One deliberate deviation: a result that is NaN or infinite is answered as an error. JSON has no such numbers, and a string where the contract promises a number would be a false fault.

The driver — the reference executeAsyncApiAction

NcsKafkaController owns the broker (testcontainers, apache/kafka:3.8.0, KRaft), creates the twelve topics up front, and implements the hook exactly as #1738's javadoc sketches it:

  • publish with the correlation id in the header the document names — or stamped into the payload at the declared pointer, for documents that say so;
  • the reply consumer is assigned and positioned at the end before publishing, so a fast reply cannot slip past, and reused for the rest of the run;
  • wait until a record carrying the id arrives or replyTimeoutMs runs out; a reply carrying someone else's id is skipped, one carrying none is taken and reported as correlationMatched = false;
  • fill AsyncApiReplyDto and judge nothing.

kafka-clients and testcontainers-kafka appear only in this test module, managed in the root pom.xml as the doc requires. Nothing is added to any shipped jar.

The test

AsyncApiTestBase joins the other bases in e2e-tests-utils: initAndRun, and helpers that read AsyncApiCallResult off the solution. NcsKafkaEMTest runs 300 action evaluations and asserts:

  • every operation was answered;
  • checkTriangle, bessj and remainder reached their result reply;
  • expint and gammq reached both their result and their error — the two operations whose rejected inputs (x < 0; a ≤ 0 || x < 0) the schema does not rule out. bessj's order and remainder's operands are bounded in the schema, so their error replies need invalid data, which the search does not publish yet — worth knowing, and a natural next lever;
  • no NO_REPLY, no PUBLISH_FAILED.

Because the driver is embedded, the SUT is instrumented, so the search covers lines and branches of a message-driven service as well: 662 targets in 26 seconds, identical on two runs.

Not here

The createTests false constraint still stands, so runTestHandlingFlaky is used rather than the compilation variant. Once the test writer exists, this is where its output gets compiled and run too.

@LautaroPetaccio
LautaroPetaccio force-pushed the feature/asyncapi-e2e-kafka branch from 4b4a66a to 64b5a5a Compare September 14, 2026 11:59
@LautaroPetaccio
LautaroPetaccio force-pushed the feature/asyncapi-examples branch from 5d3566d to 66440f3 Compare September 14, 2026 22:17
@LautaroPetaccio
LautaroPetaccio force-pushed the feature/asyncapi-e2e-kafka branch from 64b5a5a to e69f386 Compare September 14, 2026 22:19
Everything so far is in core and reads a document. This is the other side:
what a driver must provide so that the core can drive an AsyncAPI service
without knowing anything about brokers.

AsyncApiProblem declares that the SUT is driven by messages. It carries only
the document -- a location to fetch it from, or the text itself. The
connection to the broker stays in the driver and never crosses, which is what
keeps the core free of any broker library.

Note it may be declared with the document inline, which REST has no real need
for. A REST service usually serves its own contract over HTTP; a service that
speaks only Kafka has no endpoint to serve anything from, so its document is
far more likely to be a file shipped beside it.

SutController.executeAsyncApiAction is where a driver publishes one message
and, when a reply is expected, waits for the one that answers it. It is the
counterpart of executeAction for RPC. It has a default that throws rather
than being abstract, so that adding it does not break every existing driver;
the message says what to override. Only publish and await are
protocol-specific, and they never leave the driver.

The driver is asked to report what happened, not to judge it:
AsyncApiReplyDto distinguishes published-with-no-reply-expected, a reply that
arrived, silence within the window, and a failure to publish at all. The last
of those is a broken setup rather than a finding about the service, which is
why it is kept apart from silence. Deciding what an outcome means is the
core's job, so that it means the same thing whatever the transport.

Also carried in the reply is whether the correlation id came back. Whether
correlation works cannot be read off a contract, since echoing the id is the
service's own behaviour, so it is established by watching for it.

Wiring: a field on SutInfoDto, a field on ActionDto, and two branches in
EMController.
Review feedback: CORRELATION_IN_HEADER and CORRELATION_IN_PAYLOAD closed the
class, after every instance field. docs/for_developers.md puts constants
first.
Review feedback, and docs/for_developers.md: a Map field says what its key
and value are. Both header maps go from header name to its text.
A null list failed inside addAll anyway; the check now sits where the
method starts, named, as docs/for_developers.md asks of public methods.
Review feedback: replyTimeoutMs is null when no reply is expected, and
waitedMs when the driver did not wait at all, which the javadoc left
unsaid.
Review feedback: it echoes ActionDto.index, which newAction has already
dereferenced by the time the reply is built, so an int says what the
Integer could only promise.
@LautaroPetaccio
LautaroPetaccio force-pushed the feature/asyncapi-examples branch from 66440f3 to 179e5d3 Compare September 15, 2026 16:29
ProblemType.ASYNCAPI, experimental like the other recent types. Main infers
it from SutInfoDto.asyncApiProblem, picks its algorithm key, and stops with
a clear message where the module will go: the sampler and fitness that
complete it are the next changes.

The one decision here is EMConfig.usesDriver(). Every other type reaches
the driver only in white-box mode, or in black-box experiments. An AsyncAPI
service has no universal wire to point at, so the driver holds the broker
connection even when the service is a black box. The places in Main and
Statistics that asked "is there a driver" now ask the config, instead of
each spelling the rule out.
AsyncApiSampler asks the driver where the document is, reads it, builds one
action per publishable message, and samples sequences of them. The first
individuals it hands out publish one message each, one per operation, so
every operation is tried before the search starts combining them.

One sampler for both modes. Where REST and GraphQL fetch the schema
themselves in black-box mode, here the document comes through the driver
either way, as the driver is what holds the connection to the broker.

Seeded test cases are not supported yet, and say so.
Review: what the parser skips was reported to the user and kept for the
final report, but nothing checked it; nor that the single-message
individuals return after a reset, nor the two other ways start-up can
fail. Four tests, and the helper that builds the injector is shared.
Four TODOs, where someone will next look: no AsyncAPI-specific smart
strategy yet, message examples parsed but unused, no seeding format, and a
method shared verbatim with the REST sampler.
RemoteController.executeNewAsyncApiActionAndGetReply PUTs the action to the
driver and reads back an AsyncApiReplyDto, as its RPC counterpart does. It
has a default that throws, so the controllers that never publish need not
say so one by one.

EMConfig gains asyncApiReplyTimeoutMs, experimental, and a constraint:
there is no test writer for AsyncAPI yet, so a run must say
--createTests false rather than search for an hour and fail at the end.
The two tests that already parsed --problemType ASYNCAPI say so now.

Two experimental fault categories: a promised reply that never arrives,
and a reply matching none of the messages the contract declares.
AsyncApiBlackBoxFitness publishes each message of a test through the
driver and turns what comes back into targets: for every operation, what
publishing to it was seen to do, and, when a reply came back, which of the
messages the contract declares for the reply it was. A contract listing a
result and an error thus gives the search two things to reach, which is
the AsyncAPI analogue of REST's (status x endpoint).

AsyncApiReplyClassifier is what recognises a reply: a structural match
against each declared payload schema, reading the parts of JSON Schema
that tell one message from another and giving the benefit of the doubt on
the rest. The most specific match wins.

AsyncApiModule binds it all, with the driver bound unconditionally, and
Main uses it in place of the message it showed until now. One test runs a
whole MIO search against a stand-in for the NCS service and sees both
declared replies of an operation covered.
Review: with room for exactly two messages, a one-message test was
mutated by removal, leaving a test that publishes nothing; and a test
could never grow to the maximum the user allowed, only to one less. Both
bounds are now stated as such, and AsyncApiStructureMutatorTest holds
them.

Seeding test cases is refused at start-up, like writing them, instead of
failing inside the sampler. The whole-search suite is named after the
class it exercises, AsyncApiModule, and the three suites that build the
injector share how they do it.
Review: the ':' joining a target id and the '-' inside a correlation id
were spelled out where used; they are constants now, and the two kinds of
target id are built in one place each. The remote controller named its
queryFromDatabase parameter four times over, once in the new call and
three in the ones it mirrors; it is a constant now. The fake driver's one
field comes before its companion.
A document's message examples are what its author knows the service
accepts. A service that silently drops what it does not recognise may
never answer a sampled payload, so with --probAsyncApiExamples the first
example of a message is offered as a whole value beside the schema-derived
genes, at that probability. Off by default, like every new feature.

It reuses what REST already does with a schema's 'example': the example is
put on the message's own copy of the payload schema, and the gene builder
turns it into the same choice it offers REST. Only the first example is
used: the OpenAPI parser the genes go through reads the schemas as 3.0,
which drops the plural 'examples'. Scalars are left alone, as the builder
would complain about 'example' on them. A headers example loses the field
the correlation id is stamped into, as the headers gene did before it.
The first search against a real broker. The SUT is the NCS case study
re-expressed as a Kafka service: six request topics answered on six reply
topics with a result or an error, as ncs-kafka.yaml describes. It speaks
only Kafka; there is no HTTP endpoint. Its routines are ported from EMB's
NCS and cited as such.

The driver owns the broker, a testcontainers apache/kafka, and is the
reference implementation of SutController.executeAsyncApiAction: publish
with the correlation id where the document says it goes, wait for the
reply that carries it back, report and do not judge. kafka-clients and
testcontainers-kafka are used only here, in the test tree, and are managed
in the root pom like everything else.

The test asserts that every operation answers and that expint and gammq
each reach both their declared replies. Those two are the operations whose
rejected inputs the schema does not rule out; bessj's and remainder's
bounds are in the schema, so their errors need invalid data, which the
search does not publish yet. 662 targets in 26 seconds, on two runs.
@LautaroPetaccio
LautaroPetaccio force-pushed the feature/asyncapi-examples branch from 179e5d3 to 2495b28 Compare September 15, 2026 23:46
@LautaroPetaccio
LautaroPetaccio force-pushed the feature/asyncapi-e2e-kafka branch from e69f386 to 8e17ab8 Compare September 15, 2026 23:46
@LautaroPetaccio
LautaroPetaccio force-pushed the feature/asyncapi-examples branch from 2495b28 to 82d1889 Compare September 16, 2026 01:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant