HIVE-29388: Operations on parquet tables with qouted identifier columns run into exceptions#6506
Open
tanishq-chugh wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
HIVE-29388: Operations on parquet tables with qouted identifier columns run into exceptions#6506tanishq-chugh wants to merge 4 commits into
tanishq-chugh wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
asf-ci-hive
added
tests pending
tests unstable
and removed
tests pending
tests unstable
labels
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix select & insert queries on parquet tables with qouted identifier columns running into errors
Why are the changes needed?
To fix errors in select & insert queries on parquet tables with qouted identifier columns
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes, Queries initially running into errors will now run successfully
How was this patch tested?
Manual Testing + have added a QTest with failing coverage