Skip to content

feat(extraction): preserve first-person negations in extraction prompt #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
moralespanitz wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat(extraction): preserve first-person negations in extraction prompt #3

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions src/services/extraction.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ RULES:
- **CORRECTION/REVISION PRESERVATION**: When the conversation contains an explicit correction, revision, or supersession of a previous statement (e.g. "Correction:", "Actually,", "Changed my mind"), the extracted fact MUST preserve the corrective relationship. Include phrasing like "instead of Y", "replacing Y", "corrected from Y", or "no longer Y" so the system can detect the supersession.
WRONG: "User wants PostgreSQL for the production backend."
RIGHT: "User wants PostgreSQL for the production backend, replacing the earlier MongoDB choice."
- **NEGATIVE STATEMENT PRESERVATION**: When the user makes a negative-tense factual assertion in FIRST PERSON about themselves (e.g. "I have never used X", "I haven't tried Y", "I did not configure Z", "I never integrated W"), the extracted fact MUST preserve the negation explicitly. Do NOT normalize to a positive statement, do NOT drop the fact as non-actionable, and do NOT confuse it with assistant tutorial text containing "haven't" (e.g. "if you haven't already installed..."). Negative facts establish what the user has NOT done and are critical for contradiction detection across long conversations.
WRONG: "User is using Flask-Login for authentication." (when user said "I have never integrated Flask-Login")
WRONG: dropping the fact entirely.
RIGHT: "User has never integrated Flask-Login for session management in the project."
RIGHT: "User has never written Flask routes or handled HTTP requests in this project."
- Skip pleasantries, filler, acknowledgments, and meta-conversation.
- Skip generic assistant chatter (acknowledgments, "sure!", "got it", "as an AI").
- DO extract specific factual content from assistant responses: named entities, recommendations with proper nouns, schedules, data tables, creative writing with specific details. Prefix these with "Assistant mentioned:" or "Assistant recommended:".
Expand Down
Loading