Skip to content

[REHEARSAL] scaffold: emit a program-id output block per program - #12

Closed
michael-moffett wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
p032/scaffold-339-program-id-output
Closed

[REHEARSAL] scaffold: emit a program-id output block per program#12
michael-moffett wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
p032/scaffold-339-program-id-output

Conversation

@michael-moffett

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Internal CI rehearsal on the caliperforge fork. Do not merge, do not review.

Sole purpose is to fire pull_request checks for this head against fork main at 6306f8ee56de85687d42593b803622fbdc69e146, which now tracks upstream. Moving the base under an already-open PR does not re-fire pull_request workflows, so a fresh PR is the only way to get the checks to run.

Head is unchanged and unpushed: 681bd0069961e952e0a829665d6b56b64dc3239f. No rebase, no force-push, no empty commit.

Supersedes rehearsal #9, which ran against the older base e3b7df0.

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

This rehearsal PR adds a generated program-ID output block for each scaffolded program.

  • Appends program-ID outputs to both in-memory and on-disk deployment runbooks.
  • Adds a unit test covering multiple output blocks and blank-line separation.

Confidence Score: 5/5

No actionable changed-code defect was established.

The new helper is consistently invoked alongside each generated deployment action, and the added test verifies the expected multi-program output rendering.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
crates/cli/src/scaffold/mod.rs Adds per-program deployment output generation in both scaffold paths and verifies the rendered output format.

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "test(scaffold): assert the program-outpu..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@michael-moffett

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Internal CI rehearsal, purpose served. Closing to keep the fork clean.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant