Repository navigation
deckd: read a revision back, and report its parent #7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[Claude Code 🤖] "In path order" doesn't describe the order
/treeactually returns. A caller that merge-joins the list against a sorted disk listing will get mismatches.CommitService::treepasses along jj'sMergedTree::entries(), which walks depth-first and sorts each directory by component name (jj-lib 0.46TreeEntriesIterator;GitBackend::read_treere-sorts git's entries by component). So a directory comes before a sibling file whose name it prefixes:/treereturnsAuthor/jane.json, thenAuthor.gtsArray.prototype.sortall putAuthor.gtsfirst (.0x2e </0x2f)Realms routinely have a
Foo.gtsnext to aFoo/instance directory, so recovery will hit this case.Either sort
entriesby the full path string before returning (entries.sort_by(|a, b| a.path.cmp(&b.path)), then "byte order ofpath" is a precise contract), or document the order as it is. I'd sort, since a flat byte order is what a caller can reproduce. Either way,tree_lists_every_file_with_its_git_blob_idshould covera.txt+a/b.txt: the currentb.json/dir/a.gtspair has the same order under both rules, so it can't tell them apart. The doc comment onCommitService::treemakes the same claim.Regression (new contract in this PR), non-blocking unless the realm-server consumer relies on the order.