Skip to content

docs: fix typo avaliable -> available - #5287

Open
vaibhav8a wants to merge 1 commit into
cefsharp:masterfrom
vaibhav8a:fix-typo-available
Open

docs: fix typo avaliable -> available#5287
vaibhav8a wants to merge 1 commit into
cefsharp:masterfrom
vaibhav8a:fix-typo-available

Conversation

@vaibhav8a

@vaibhav8a vaibhav8a commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Corrects the misspelling avaliable -> available in CefSharp.Example/Filters/PassThruResponseFilter.cs.

Documentation only, no behaviour change.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected a spelling error in an internal code comment.
    • No user-facing functionality or behavior changed.

Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Srivastava <vaibhavsri1712@gmail.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 0b2da69c-bbef-4604-97f1-93787aa4523a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2b87fe and d3c5863.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CefSharp.Example/Filters/PassThruResponseFilter.cs

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The change corrects a spelling error in an inline comment within PassThruResponseFilter. No code behavior or public declarations change.

Changes

Comment Correction

Layer / File(s) Summary
Inline comment correction
CefSharp.Example/Filters/PassThruResponseFilter.cs
The Filter method comment changes “avaliable” to “available”.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to d3c58

This documentation-only correction fixes a spelling error without changing runtime behavior, so no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description accurately summarizes the typo correction and states that behavior does not change, but it omits the required template sections, including fixes, changes, testing, change types, and ch… Update the description to use the repository template. Include the issue reference or state that none applies, summary, changed structure, testing details, applicable change types, and checklist selections.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 1 functions across 1 files. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the typo correction and matches the documentation-only change.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description accurately summarizes the typo correction and states that behavior does not change, but it omits the required template sections, including fixes, changes, testing, change types, and checklist items.

  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@AppVeyorBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants