Repository navigation
Conversation
The integration docs still used the pre-2024 commands: describe and attach by ID, a removed `workflow integration attach`, and attach without the `--project` flag that is now required, so each example fails flag validation. The smtp registration example was also missing the required `--name`, and a comment inside the oci-registry continuation ended the command early. Assisted-by: Claude Code Signed-off-by: Roshan Ramani <roshanramani.dev@gmail.com>
Contributor
PR validation — ✅ 3 passing
AI Session Checks —
|
| Status | Policy | Messages |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Passed | secrets-detection |
- |
✅ sast-scan
| Status | Policy | Messages |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Passed | cwe-top25 |
- |
| ✅ Passed | owasp-top10-2025 |
- |
| ✅ Passed | sast |
- |
| ✅ Passed | cwe-top26-40-cusp |
- |
Scans not applied (3)
| Scan | Reason |
|---|---|
vulnerability-scan |
no manifest/lockfile changed |
github-actions-scan |
no workflow files changed |
iac-scan |
no IaC files changed |
Security context
✅ Nothing this change touches has a recorded security-fix history.
View in Chainloop ↗ · How this works ↗
Powered by Chainloop and Chainloop Trace
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 7 files
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
View guided diff | Re-trigger cubic
The guac README still said the attach command takes IDs, and the attachment paragraph in devel/integrations.md was missing a word. Assisted-by: Claude Code Signed-off-by: Roshan Ramani <roshanramani.dev@gmail.com>
migmartri
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The integration docs (
devel/integrations.mdand the plugin READMEs) still show the commands from before #1046/#1051 moved integrations from IDs to names and #1515 made--projectrequired onintegration attached add. As written, every attach example fails withrequired flag(s) "project" not set,available describe --idfails withunknown flag: --id, and the smtp README still useschainloop workflow integration attach, which no longer exists. The smtp registration example was also missing the required--name, and indevel/integrations.mda#comment line inside the oci-registry backslash continuation ended the command before its--optlines.This updates those commands to the current flags, with placeholders in the
[name]style the READMEs already use. I ran each changed command against a CLI built frommain: they all get past argument and flag validation and stop only at the connection to the control plane. The sample output tables in these docs are older than the commands (for exampledependencytrackas an ID) and I left them as they are.This was written with Claude Code and found by parsing every
chainloop ...command in the repo's Markdown with the CLI's own cobra flag sets.