Skip to content

chore: drop uv.lock, committed to #17 by accident - #19

Merged
donbagger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/drop-stray-uv-lock
Aug 14, 2026
Merged

chore: drop uv.lock, committed to #17 by accident#19
donbagger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/drop-stray-uv-lock

Conversation

@donbagger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

My mistake in #17. uv.lock is 3,162 lines, 93% of that PR, and none of it
belongs in this repo.

The project builds with setup.py and pyproject.toml and does not reference uv
anywhere. That file only recorded the throwaway environment I ran the tests in:
pytest, requests and pydantic pulled in with uv run --with. It is my local
tooling, not this project's dependency graph, and anyone reading it would
reasonably assume otherwise.

How it got in. I deleted it before the first commit. Re-running the tests to
verify the CodeQL fix regenerated it, and the git add -A on the second commit
swept it up. Now in .gitignore so it cannot recur.

The real change in #17 was 243 lines across five files:

dexpaprika_sdk/client.py 54+ / 2-
tests/test_api_key.py 133+
README.md 42+
CHANGELOG.md 13+
dexpaprika_sdk/__init__.py 1+ / 1-

I checked the other three SDK PRs for the same problem: Go, TypeScript and PHP
are all clean, only intended files.

3,162 lines, 93% of that pull request, and none of it belongs here. The project
builds with setup.py and pyproject.toml and does not use uv anywhere; that file
only recorded the throwaway environment I ran the tests in (pytest, requests,
pydantic pulled in with 'uv run --with').

It slipped in on the second commit: re-running the tests to check the CodeQL fix
regenerated the file, and 'git add -A' swept it up. Added to .gitignore so it
cannot happen again.

The real change in #17 was 243 lines across five files.
@donbagger
donbagger merged commit 09037dd into main Aug 14, 2026
7 checks passed
@donbagger
donbagger deleted the chore/drop-stray-uv-lock branch August 14, 2026 14:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant