Production 504 Gateway Timeout on insights.cppalliance.org/weblate.#146
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 45 minutes and 44 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR updates CD environment defaults for Postgres and Redis, and adjusts Quickbook parsing so inline URL markers can be followed by prose on the same line. ChangesCD environment defaults
Quickbook inline marker parsing
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/boost_weblate/utils/quickbook.py`:
- Around line 486-490: The paragraph scan in quickbook.py still skips inline
QuickBook markup before collecting the msgid, so `[@...]` content is lost and
only trailing prose is extracted. Update the paragraph parsing logic around the
inline-bracket handling and whitespace skip path so `[`@url` text]` remains
pass-through in the paragraph msgid instead of being discarded, while still
avoiding the scan-loop stall. Keep the fix localized to the inline markup branch
used by the paragraph extraction code.
In `@tests/utils/test_quickbook.py`:
- Around line 354-363: The test is asserting the wrong msgid for inline [@...]
markup in _parse_qbk; update
test_parse_qbk_inline_url_followed_by_prose_on_same_line to expect the full
paragraph text, including the inline markup content, rather than only the
trailing prose. Use the _parse_qbk behavior and the msgid assertions in this
test to align the expected output with the parser’s documented contract.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 8641c0f8-fd8b-47c8-98eb-b97df11245d7
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.env.exampledocker/docker-compose.cd.ymlsrc/boost_weblate/utils/quickbook.pytests/utils/test_quickbook.py
Close #145.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Documentation