Repository navigation
Handling of system.long addressed - #96
bryantaustin13 wants to merge 7 commits into
Conversation
brynrhodes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is great that it uses the capability statement to get the fhir version, but skipping
|
@brynrhodes - Why should we skip tests with Longs for R4? There is a mapping for CQL Long to R4. Given that the mapping exists and is R4-compliant, there is no reason a compliant CQL server could not return Long results in R4 (and, in fact, the javascript engine does). The real problem is that the test runner doesn't correctly detect equality for Longs. See #79. |
|
See cqframework/clinical_quality_language#1750 for engine handling of R4 system.long. This branch should handle the cases of the different FHIR and CQL versions in regards to system.long. So it is currently failing for R4. |
|
Superseded by #120. Now that I have committer access on Note the approval on this PR predates #106 and #110 and should not carry over — #120 needs re-scoping against current |
No description provided.