[testdata]: Add ambiguous golden answers

[luke-hill]

🤔 What's changed?

WIP: Adds another cck example that has valid answers to be asserted upon

⚡️ What's your motivation?

Allows more of the CCK to be tested

🏷️ What kind of change is this?

• 🏦 Refactoring/debt/DX (improvement to code design, tooling, etc. without changing behaviour)

♻️ Anything particular you want feedback on?

📋 Checklist:

6/42 files correct

• Initial Commit: findAllPickles / findAllTestCases / findAllTestSteps / findTestCaseBy / findTestStepBy / findPickleBy
• I agree to respect and uphold the Cucumber Community Code of Conduct
• I've changed the behaviour of the code
  • I have added/updated tests to cover my changes.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• Users should know about my change
  • I have added an entry to the "Unreleased" section of the CHANGELOG, linking to this pull request.

---

This text was originally generated from a template, then edited by hand. You can modify the template here.

[davidjgoss]

This is missing a change to add ambiguous to the allow list of samples to test and regenerate.

• java https://github.com/cucumber/query/blob/main/java/src/test/java/io/cucumber/query/QueryAcceptanceTest.java#L101
• javascript https://github.com/cucumber/query/blob/main/javascript/src/acceptance.spec.ts#L24
• dotnet https://github.com/cucumber/query/blob/main/dotnet/Cucumber.QueryTest/QueryAcceptanceTest.cs#L15

[luke-hill]

@davidjgoss Assuming those languages are utilising the full suite, this would break them currently.

I can add that change at the end of this PR once I've fixed up all 42 files (Atm only 6 of them I've confirmed to be correct).

[mpkorstanje]

@luke-hill what code does this cover that isn't already covered by the existing test cases?