Skip to content

Labels

Labels

  • .NET

    Pull requests that update .net code
  • dependencies

    Pull requests that update a dependency file
  • do not merge

    Blocks merging a PR
  • github_actions

    Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code
  • help wanted

    Good issues for community members to address
  • meeting: discuss

    This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting
  • meeting: priority

    Review before meeting. Merge, merge with issues, or reject at the next TC49-TC2 meeting
  • meeting: proposal

    There is an informal proposal in the issue, worth discussing in a meeting
  • resolved: by-design

    The issue was examined, and we decided it wasn't a problem after all
  • resolved: duplicate

    This issue is already in another issue
  • resolved: fixed

    This was fixed by a change (which should be linked)
  • resolved: known-deviation

    We know Roslyn deviates from the spec, but we don't want to change the spec
  • resolved: wontfix

    The issue was examined, and we decided to live with it
  • Review: complete

    at least one person has reviewed this
  • Review: in progress

    at least one person is reviewing this
  • Review: pending

    Proposal is available for review
  • Review: work pending

  • status: dependency

    This issue or PR depends on another (see comments)
  • status: gnarly

    This issue is likely to require very significant work to resolve
  • status: good first issue

    Good for newcomers
  • status: in-progress

    The assignee has actively started working on this; consult with them before taking other actions
  • status: needs triaging

  • status: proposal approved

    A proposal discussed with a "meeting: proposal" label has been approved; next step is a PR
  • type: bug

    The Standard does not describe the language as intended or implemented
  • type: clarity

    While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
  • type: feature

    This issue describes a new feature
  • type: formatting

    The Standard has incorrect formatting (or a typo)
  • type: future bug :rainbow:

    Issues identified that become issues in a future spec version
  • type: process

    This issue relates to processes
  • type: tools

    This issue (or PR) relates to a tool, not the Standard