[release/10.0] Fix LoaderHeap's free list growing more than expected#129592
[release/10.0] Fix LoaderHeap's free list growing more than expected#129592eduardo-vp wants to merge 8 commits into
Conversation
This reverts commit 96f0039.
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @agocke |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR backports the .NET 10 fix for a severe performance regression caused by UnlockedLoaderHeap free-list growth during high-concurrency generic method instantiation. It prevents multiple threads from racing to allocate and then discard redundant InstantiatedMethodDesc allocations, which previously inflated the free list and made subsequent allocations increasingly expensive.
Changes:
- Added a shared helper (
SatisfiesMethodConstraintsForInstantiation) to evaluate generic method constraints given an explicit instantiation. - Changed
InstantiatedMethodDesc::NewInstantiatedMethodDescto holdm_InstMethodHashTableCrstacross lookup and creation/insertion, ensuring only one thread allocates/registers aMethodDescper instantiation. - Refactored
MethodDesc::SatisfiesMethodConstraintsto delegate to the new helper.
|
Hi, the code complete date for 10.0.10 (the July 2026 release) is 24 June. Make sure to merge this PR on that date at the latest (or explicitly let me know that I should merge it), or it won't make it into that release. As a reminder, if this is a product change, you also need Tactics approval before merging this PR (test-only or infra-only changes don't require Tactics approval). |
|
/ba-g Ran the pipeline a second time, the only failure it's because of that ( |
|
We have a tactics approval, but given the risk, we should run it for a few more weeks before merging. |
Backport of #129203 to release/10.0
Customer Impact
This is a regression that impacts apps running test suites, running sometimes even 6x to 8x slower on Linux. Reported in #123124, in particular in this comment #123124 (comment).
Regression
Testing
Tested performance with the benchmark provided by the customer and another one in #129203 (comment). The issue happens under a high volume of method instantiations, we don't have such test. We could consider adding one.
Risk
Medium/Low. Actually the change is not that big -
SatisfiesMethodConstraintsis refactored and callsSatisfiesMethodConstraintsForInstantiationnow. Also, insideInstantiatedMethodDesc::NewInstantiatedMethodDescwe previously took a lock, released it and took it again. Now we just don't release it in the middle and the call toSatisfiesMethodConstraintswas moved to the beginning of the method. Unfortunately the github diff is way bigger than it should.I also let the change sit in main for one week and no issues were linked to the original PR.
IMPORTANT: If this backport is for a servicing release, please verify that:
release/X.0-staging, notrelease/X.0.release/X.0(no-stagingsuffix).Package authoring no longer needed in .NET 9
IMPORTANT: Starting with .NET 9, you no longer need to edit a NuGet package's csproj to enable building and bump the version.
Keep in mind that we still need package authoring in .NET 8 and older versions.