Repository navigation
Conversation
|
I was thinking of something more like: in the https://github.com/edgcpp/edgcpp.github.io repo. |
That would be fine too; I see there's a 7.0 tag instead of branch so that works. Does your development model need an in-progress docs vs release docs like Boost does? |
|
I think it would be good to have release vs in development docs for sure. My hope was to at least have release docs present under |
|
The 7.0 tagged website is available here https://edgcpp.org/doc/. It is built out of the main website repo as suggested. |
|
Ok /doc/ now tracks the specified tagged release and this workflow now triggers a build and deployment at /dev/doc so that it can track the current |
|
GitHub pages was not enabled; looks like the cleanup here is nice. I want to check with some other folks on the workflow in the morning to make sure this agrees with the desired documentation behavior. Thanks! |
Sounds good. If anything needs to change let me know. |
DarkArc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
After discussion I think I'm okay with merging this as-is, but some additional thoughts with fresh eyes this morning.
|
@DarkArc I think these latest two commits hit the review comments you were looking for. Once the docker.io/edgcpp/sphinx-env:latest is updated the changes to documentation.yml would be minimal. Your choice on whether you'd like to merge now or wait for the docker container to be updated on docker.io. Attached is the required patch file: |
|
Merged; thanks! |
This adds a workflow for building and deploying the documentation. Updates the README to point to edgcpp.org/compiler/ since GitHub Pages follows the names of the repos, but if need be we can stick a redirect in the main website repository that redirects edgcpp.org/doc/ to edgcpp.org/compiler.