Skip to content

fix: judge failure now prints the correct failed expectation #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
scastlara merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2026
+4 −5
Merged

fix: judge failure now prints the correct failed expectation #9

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 4 additions & 5 deletions src/pytest_catnip/runner.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -337,16 +337,15 @@ async def _assert_post_phase(
f"\n[{case_path}] Phase {phase_idx}: reply doesn't match {pattern!r}.\n Reply: {reply[:300]!r}"
)

judge_coros = []
for judge_prompt in phase.expect_llm_judge or []:
judge_coros.append(llm_judge_function(reply, judge_prompt))
judge_expectations = phase.expect_llm_judge or []
judge_coros = [llm_judge_function(reply, judge_prompt) for judge_prompt in judge_expectations]
if judge_coros:
results = await asyncio.gather(*judge_coros)
for passed, reason in results:
for i, (passed, reason) in enumerate(results):
if not passed:
raise AssertionError(
f"\n[{case_path}] Phase {phase_idx}: LLM judge failed.\n"
f" Judge prompt: {judge_prompt!r}\n"
f" Judge prompt: {judge_expectations[i]!r}\n"
f" Bot reply: {reply!r}\n"
f" Judge reason: {reason!r}"
)
Expand Down
Loading