fix(ci,test): fix issues with PR CI runs in focil branch

[fselmo]

Description

Keep strict checks on inclusion lists but fix CI for the time while we are hijacking amsterdam's t8n for FOCIL work.

Related Issues or PRs

N/A.

Checklist

• Ran fast static checks to avoid CI fails, see Code Standards & Verifying Changes: just static
• PR title has the form <type>(<area>): <title>, where <type> and <area> come from an appropriate C-<type>, respectively A-<area>, label. The title should match the target squash commit message.

Cute Animal Picture

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (eips/amsterdam/eip-7805@4e4fd2e). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                    Coverage Diff                     @@
##             eips/amsterdam/eip-7805    #3594   +/-   ##
==========================================================
  Coverage                           ?   94.43%           
==========================================================
  Files                              ?      624           
  Lines                              ?    36953           
  Branches                           ?     3329           
==========================================================
  Hits                               ?    34896           
  Misses                             ?     1454           
  Partials                           ?      603           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	94.43% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[fselmo]

@gurukamath I'm not really privy to all the details of the amsterdam path for bogota EIPs so I want to make sure this is an OK change. I'd like to try to get CI passing for FOCIL while we don't have a proper setup for bogota and I want to also make sure to keep this strict check on inclusion lists. I think this is a decent compromise on both of these.

I think the failing pypy run here is an OOM issue. I'm ok with this for now I suppose... but will investigate this as well if I get some more time. At least the other CI jobs are better.

[fselmo]

Ok pypy issue fixed as well as the json loader. This was an interesting find, from a quick Claude scan:

Inclusion-list fixture variants were built for every test at every fork, and dropped only after collection, because the rule that drops them needs a fork. Collection for fill-pypy and json-loader grew from 224k to 319k items, and peak memory per process from about 1.6 GB to 2.0 GB. It showed up as a PyPy MemoryError and xdist workers dying mid-collection, not as anything about Bogota. Fixed by applying the rule when tests are generated.