Skip to content

Add verify-document + verify-citations skills (document trust verification) - #2877

Open
Sketchjar wants to merge 1 commit into
github:mainfrom
Sketchjar:add-stipple-document-verification
Open

Add verify-document + verify-citations skills (document trust verification)#2877
Sketchjar wants to merge 1 commit into
github:mainfrom
Sketchjar:add-stipple-document-verification

Conversation

@Sketchjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown

""" + body + """

Two document-trust skills using the Stipple API (free anonymous tier):

- verify-document: forensic authenticity — tamper risk band +
  per-signal evidence (amount/words mismatch, font discontinuity,
  date anomalies, identifier checksums) for PDFs/images. Two axes:
  risk_band (is anything tampered) and inspection_quality (could the
  engine see enough to judge) — low coverage is explicitly not risk.

- verify-citations: citations resolve and support claims; arithmetic
  recomputes; unsupported claims flagged. For research reports, tender
  responses, whitepapers — especially LLM-generated content.

Both fill a gap no existing skill covers: processing a document is
orthogonal to trusting it. skill:validate + build both pass.
@Sketchjar
Sketchjar requested a review from aaronpowell as a code owner August 31, 2026 10:28
@github-actions github-actions Bot added new-submission PR adds at least one new contribution skills PR touches skills labels Aug 31, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔴 Contributor Reputation Check: HIGH risk

Check Risk
Profile HIGH
Credential audit NONE

Maintainers: please review this contributor before merging.
See the workflow run for full details.
Automated check powered by AGT.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔒 PR Risk Scan Results

Scanned 2 changed file(s).

Severity Count
🔴 High 0
🟠 Medium 0
ℹ️ Info 0

✅ No matching risk patterns were detected in changed files.

This is an automated soft-gate report. Findings indicate review targets and do not block merge by themselves.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the needs-review:HIGH Contributor reputation check flagged HIGH risk label Aug 31, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 Vally Lint Results

✅ All checks passed

Scope Checked
Skills 2
Agents 0
Total 2
Severity Count
❌ Errors 0
⚠️ Warnings 0
ℹ️ Advisories 0

Summary

Level Finding
ℹ️ ✅ verify-citations (2/2 checks passed)
ℹ️ ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
ℹ️ ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
ℹ️ ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
ℹ️ ✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.
ℹ️ 1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed
ℹ️ ✅ verify-document (2/2 checks passed)
ℹ️ ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
ℹ️ ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
ℹ️ ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
Full linter output
### Linting skills/verify-citations
✅ verify-citations (2/2 checks passed)
    ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
        ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
    ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
        ✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.

1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed

### Linting skills/verify-document
✅ verify-document (2/2 checks passed)
    ✓ [spec-compliance] All 1 skill(s) are spec-compliant.
        ✓ spec-compliance: All spec checks passed.
    ✓ [valid-refs] All file references across 1 skill(s) are valid.
        ✓ valid-refs: All file references resolve to existing files within the skill directory.

1 skill(s) linted, 1 passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-review:HIGH Contributor reputation check flagged HIGH risk new-submission PR adds at least one new contribution skills PR touches skills

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant