You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Fix grammar error in Actions support documentation: "are be formatted" #42554
There's a grammatical error with a duplicate verb on line 40. The sentence contains "are be formatted" which should be "are formatted".
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
In the section about providing runner logs to support, there's a grammatical error.
Current text:
"Self-hosted runner log file names are be formatted: Runner_YYYY####-xxxxxx-utc.log and Worker_YYYY####-xxxxxx-utc.log."
Should be:
"Self-hosted runner log file names are formatted: Runner_YYYY####-xxxxxx-utc.log and Worker_YYYY####-xxxxxx-utc.log."
Why: The phrase "are be formatted" contains a double verb (grammatical error). It should simply be "are formatted".
Use case: This improves readability and professionalism of the documentation. Grammar errors can confuse readers, especially non-native English speakers.
Expected outcome: Correct, clear sentence that's easier to read and understand.
Additional information
This is located in the file content/actions/how-tos/get-support.md. I'm happy to submit a PR to fix this.
@Nsanjayboruds The PR you made for this was fine. Would you like to reopen it so I can approve it? The checks failing was nothing to do with you, we're just trying to make them more efficient and it usually breaks them temporarily.
hey @Sharra-writes
Thanks for letting me know!
I’ll go ahead and open a new PR #42674 so it can be reviewed and approved.
Appreciate the clarification about the checks and thanks for your help 🙌
Activity
nguyetdth1212-commits commentedon Jan 26, 2026
Nsanjayboruds commentedon Jan 27, 2026
i fix it #42555
bugmaker00 commentedon Jan 27, 2026
Nsanjayboruds commentedon Jan 27, 2026
I’ve fixed this issue in PR #42555
Sharra-writes commentedon Jan 30, 2026
@Nsanjayboruds The PR you made for this was fine. Would you like to reopen it so I can approve it? The checks failing was nothing to do with you, we're just trying to make them more efficient and it usually breaks them temporarily.
Nsanjayboruds commentedon Feb 1, 2026
hey @Sharra-writes
Thanks for letting me know!
I’ll go ahead and open a new PR #42674 so it can be reviewed and approved.
Appreciate the clarification about the checks and thanks for your help 🙌