[aw] Rust Code Quality Reviewer failed #2295

  │ git show pr-2222:src/execute.rs | grep -n "fn append_execution_record_impl" -A 40
  └ 41 lines…
● cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw                                                          (shel…
  git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  │ cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw
  │ git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  └ 60 lines…
This is a huge, carefully tested PR. Checking rust-critic again.
Not in diff scope (pre-existing). I have enough context. Let me now confirm the `legacy_family` single-child case: if there's exactly 1 child, requiring a budget group for it might be overly strict but that's design, not a bug per se.
Let's check ado_script.rs condition removal impact more carefully — is there a risk this causes PR-triggered builds to run resolve-synthetic-pr unnecessarily (not a bug, intentional per test change)?That's handled by the bundle's own skip logic — fine, condition removal appears intentional and consistent with comment. Now let's finalize findings based on real issues found.This is unchanged/pre-existing, not part of diff. Good. Now I'll check the `validate_submit_pr_review_events` bug: when `obj.contains_key(LEGACY_PR_CONFIG)`, it bails with a generic message about "update-pr enables vote" but the actual key here is submit-pull-request-review's config — is that the legacy nested metadata, i.e. checking correctly? Let's verify LEGACY_PR_CONFIG purpose.That's legitimate — legacy-update-pr nested within submit-pull-request-review's config when migrated from update-pr's vote operation. Message is correct in that context.