feat(gooddata-sdk): [AUTO] Add ErrorInfo schema and error field to SearchResult

[yenkins-admin]

Summary

Added integration test test_search_ai_error_field to test_compute_service.py to exercise the new ErrorInfo error field on SearchResult. No SDK wrapper code changes were required because compute/service.py already returns the raw SearchResult API model, and the auto-generated client (updated by the diff) already includes the optional error: ErrorInfo field. The test verifies both the success path (error absent, results present) and the failure path (error.reason is str, error.status_code is int).

Impact: new_feature | Services: gooddata-afm-client
Tickets: GDAI-1672

Files changed

• packages/gooddata-sdk/tests/compute/test_compute_service.py

Agent decisions

Decisions (2)

No SDK wrapper class for ErrorInfo — Return raw SearchResult from API client unchanged; access result.error.reason and result.error.status_code directly

• Alternatives: Create CatalogErrorInfo SDK wrapper class, Create a CatalogSearchResult wrapper
• Why: The existing compute/service.py pattern returns raw API models (SearchResult, ChatResult, ChatHistoryResult) without wrapping them in Catalog* classes. Adding SDK wrappers would break the pattern and is not necessary since the auto-generated client already exposes the fields.

Where to place the new test — Add test_search_ai_error_field to existing test_compute_service.py (module-level skipped)

• Alternatives: Create a separate test file for error scenarios
• Why: All compute/AI tests are in this file and are module-skipped because gen-ai is not available in the test environment. Adding the new test here keeps all AI search tests together and consistent.

Assumptions to verify (3)

• The auto-generated gooddata_api_client already reflects the diff (ErrorInfo model and SearchResult.error field are present — confirmed by reading gooddata-api-client/gooddata_api_client/model/search_result.py and error_info.py)
• The existing module-level pytest.skip() in test_compute_service.py is intentional and the new test will also be skipped until the skip is removed for a live recording run
• result.error is None on a normal successful search response (the field is optional in the OpenAPI spec)

Risks (1)

• test_search_ai_error_field may record a success cassette (no error) if the search runs normally against staging; the error path (METADATA_SYNC_IN_PROGRESS) requires timing the recording during a sync window

Layers touched (1)

• tests — Added test_search_ai_error_field integration test for the new ErrorInfo.error field on SearchResult
  • packages/gooddata-sdk/tests/compute/test_compute_service.py

Source commits (gdc-nas)

• 259fb34 Merge pull request #22412 from gooddata/malmiron/GDAI-1672-error-message

OpenAPI diff

@@ gooddata-afm-client.json @@
+      "ErrorInfo": {
+        "description": "Structured error, present when the search could not run (e.g. metadata sync in progress). Absent on success.",
+        "properties": {
+          "reason": { "description": "Stable machine-readable error code.", "example": "METADATA_SYNC_IN_PROGRESS", "type": "string" },
+          "statusCode": { "format": "int32", "type": "integer" }
+        },
+        "required": ["reason", "statusCode"]
+      }
       "SearchResult": {
         "properties": {
+          "error": { "$ref": "ErrorInfo" }
         }
       }

Workflow run

---

Generated by SDK OpenAPI Sync workflow

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.96%. Comparing base (12c8d84) to head (d7f2e1c).
⚠️ Report is 18 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1604   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.96%   78.96%           
=======================================
  Files         231      231           
  Lines       15578    15578           
=======================================
  Hits        12301    12301           
  Misses       3277     3277           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.