Skip to content

Collecting real cases: silent drift, memory provenance, judgment flattening #1

Description

@hegu-1

I am publishing this repo early as a position paper, not as a finished framework.

The core claim is:

self-evolving agents, long-term memory, and AI translation are starting to share the same failure mode: capability evolves faster than human judgment can be protected, traced, and re-anchored.

I am looking for concrete cases from people building or using long-horizon agents.

Useful examples:

  • an agent improved or rewrote its own instructions, but the objective silently drifted
  • long-term memory became useful but also stale, bloated, or hard to audit
  • a coding agent kept producing output while path quality degraded
  • AI translated a user's raw judgment into polished language but erased the actual decision signal
  • a multi-agent or multi-session workflow lost provenance: no one could answer "why does the system believe this?"

The goal is to collect real failure cases and map them into a small runtime kernel vocabulary:

  • source-tagged memory updates
  • core vs. edge schema separation
  • path-quality detection
  • human-ratified calibration
  • faithful translation as a view, not a replacement

If you have a concrete case, please comment with:

  1. What system or workflow was involved?
  2. What drifted or got flattened?
  3. How did you notice?
  4. What would have made the failure auditable earlier?

This issue is meant to become a public case library for provenance-aware agent design.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions