docs(umbrella): fix the companion-papers claim in reproducibility - #92
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The reproducibility section claimed 'five companion papers in docs/paper-*/' but the repository carries exactly three paper trees (Arabic, Hebrew, and this synthesis). Restated to match the artifact layout. Compile clean: 0 errors, no undefined citations.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
The umbrella's reproducibility section claimed "five companion papers in
docs/paper-*/" — the repository carries exactly three paper trees (Arabic, Hebrew, and the umbrella itself). The claim now matches the artifact layout.Why this class
Factual accuracy: an incorrect statement of what the artifacts contain, found by auditing the papers' cross-references (the same discipline as the citation passes — the reproducibility section is a claim about the repo, and it didn't match the repo). Compile clean, 0 errors, no undefined citations.