Loumir update preview#51
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Bruno Khélifi <khelifi@in2p3.fr>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Khélifi <khelifi@in2p3.fr>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Khélifi <khelifi@in2p3.fr>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Khélifi <khelifi@in2p3.fr>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Khélifi <khelifi@in2p3.fr>
| \item curation attributes : \emph{resp\_publisher\_did}, \emph{resp\_\_date} | ||
| \item identification of the observation it belongs to : \emph{obs\_id} | ||
| \item identification of the ObsCore data products it relates to : \emph{obs\_publisher\_did} | ||
| \item access : \emph{resp\_access\_url} and \emph{resp\_access\_format} | ||
| \item response spatial coverage | ||
| \item response energy coverage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| \item curation attributes : \emph{resp\_publisher\_did}, \emph{resp\_\_date} | |
| \item identification of the observation it belongs to : \emph{obs\_id} | |
| \item identification of the ObsCore data products it relates to : \emph{obs\_publisher\_did} | |
| \item access : \emph{resp\_access\_url} and \emph{resp\_access\_format} | |
| \item response spatial coverage | |
| \item response energy coverage | |
| \item curation attributes : \emph{resp\_publisher\_did}, \emph{resp\_\_date}, | |
| \item identification of the observation it belongs to : \emph{obs\_id}, | |
| \item identification of the ObsCore data products it relates to : \emph{obs\_publisher\_did}, | |
| \item access : \emph{resp\_access\_url} and \emph{resp\_access\_format}, | |
| \item response spatial coverage, | |
| \item response energy coverage, | |
| \item response time coverage. |
| s\_ref\_energy & \ucd{meta.ref;em.energy;pos} & eV & float & {\footnotesize Energy at which the ObsCore spatial characterisation attributes s\_fov , s\_region, s\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ | ||
| \hline | ||
| {\em em\_ref\_oaa\/} & TBD & deg & double & Off-axis angle ({\em i.e.\/}, the angular separation of the target or source from the telescope optical axis) at which the ObsCore spectral characterization attributes {\em em\_res\_power\/}, {\em em\_resolution\/} are defined & NO \\ | ||
| em\_ref\_energy & \ucd{meta.ref;em.energy;em} & eV & float & {\footnotesize Energy at which the ObsCore spatial characterisation attributes em\_res\_power, em\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| em\_ref\_energy & \ucd{meta.ref;em.energy;em} & eV & float & {\footnotesize Energy at which the ObsCore spatial characterisation attributes em\_res\_power, em\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ | |
| em\_ref\_energy & \ucd{meta.ref;phys.energy} & eV & float & {\footnotesize Energy at which the ObsCore spectral characterisation attributes em\_res\_power, em\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ |
| {\centering \bf Column Name} &{\centering \bf UType} &{\centering \bf Unit} &{\centering \bf Type} &{\centering \bf Description} &{\centering \bf MAN}\\ | ||
| \hline | ||
| {\em ev\_xel\/} & TBD & unitless & integer & Number of events in an event list & NO \\ | ||
| \begin{longtable}{ | m{2.5cm} | m{4em} | m{3em} | m{3em} | m{6cm} | m{2.3em} |} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This does not fit a page width. To be changed
| ev\_xel & \ucd{meta.number;obs.event} & unitless & int & {\footnotesize Number of events in an event\_list }& NO \\ | ||
| \hline | ||
| {\em s\_ref\_oaa\/} & TBD & deg & double & Off-axis angle ({\em i.e.\/}, the angular separation of the target or source from the telescope optical axis) at which the ObsCore spatial characterization attributes {\em s\_fov\/}, {\em s\_region\/}, {\em s\_resolution\/} are defined & NO \\ | ||
| s\_ref\_energy & \ucd{meta.ref;em.energy;pos} & eV & float & {\footnotesize Energy at which the ObsCore spatial characterisation attributes s\_fov , s\_region, s\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| s\_ref\_energy & \ucd{meta.ref;em.energy;pos} & eV & float & {\footnotesize Energy at which the ObsCore spatial characterisation attributes s\_fov , s\_region, s\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ | |
| s\_ref\_energy & \ucd{meta.ref;phys.energy;pos} & eV & float & {\footnotesize Energy at which the ObsCore spatial characterisation attributes s\_fov , s\_region, s\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think em.energy is correct here.
| s\_ref\_oaa & \ucd{pos.posAng;instr.offset;pos} & deg & float & {\footnotesize Off-axis angle (i.e., the angular separation of the target or source from the telescope optical axis) at which the ObsCore spatial characterisation attributes s\_fov , s\_region, s\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ | ||
| \hline | ||
| {\em energy\_min\/} & TBD & eV & double & Energy associated to the ObsCore attribute {\em em\_max\/}, describing the minimum energy of the dataset & NO \\ | ||
| em\_ref\_oaa & \ucd{pos.posAng;instr.offset;em} & deg & float & {\footnotesize Off-axis angle (i.e., the angular separation of the target or source from the telescope optical axis) at which the ObsCore spectral characterisation attributes em\_res\_power, em\_resolution are defined} & NO \\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"pos.posAng;instr.offset;em" or "pos.posAng;instr.offset", because events are not necessary photons...
| t\_intervals & \ucd{?? }& unitless & TMOC & {\footnotesize List of observation intervals or stable/good time intervals describing the exact observation time coverage} & NO \\ | ||
| \hline | ||
| {\em obs\_mode\/} & TBD & unitless & string & Observation mode of an observation & NO \\ | ||
| energy\_min & \ucd{em.energy;stat.min} & float & eV & {\footnotesize Energy associated to the Obscore attribute em\_max, describing the minimal energy of the dataset} & NO \\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| energy\_min & \ucd{em.energy;stat.min} & float & eV & {\footnotesize Energy associated to the Obscore attribute em\_max, describing the minimal energy of the dataset} & NO \\ | |
| energy\_min & \ucd{phys.energy;stat.min} & float & eV & {\footnotesize Energy associated to the Obscore attribute em\_max, describing the minimal energy of the dataset} & NO \\ |
| @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This tex file is not used in the building of the document. What is it used for?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this table summarizes the properties of a data set identified for a response data product. This gathers the minimal set of attributes necessary to select a response file ( for example a PSF file within a set of response file) .
the main selection criteria is based on the ids either of the observation , or of the event-list .
| Action: Addition | ||
| Label: psf | ||
| Description: A dataset that records the probability density function of | ||
| spatial/angular spreading of incident photons from a point source caused |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| spatial/angular spreading of incident photons from a point source caused | |
| spatial/angular spreading of incident particles (e.g., photons) from a point source caused |
| spatial/angular spreading of incident photons from a point source caused | ||
| by the instrument (detector and/or mirror and/or analysis) | ||
|
|
||
| Relationships: narrower than #response-function |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this be narrower than #pdf ?
|
|
||
| Relationships: narrower than #response-function | ||
|
|
||
| Used-in: HESS test data release (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1421099) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Used-in: HESS test data release (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1421099) | |
| Used-in: HESS test data release (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1421099), Chandra Source Catalog data product (https://cxc.cfa.harvard.edu/csc/) |
| Description: A dataset that records the | ||
| combined telescope/instru- | ||
| ment effective area and | ||
| detector quantum efficiency as | ||
| a function of energy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Description: A dataset that records the combined telescope/instrument effective area and
detector quantum efficiency as a function of energy in a NASA OGIP Ancillary Response File compliant format.
|
|
||
| Relationships: narrower than #response-function | ||
|
|
||
| Used-in: XMM data products ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Used-in: XMM data products ? | |
| Used-in: Chandra Source Catalog ARF data products (https://cxc.cfa.harvard.edu/csc/), XMM data products |
| Description: A dataset that records the probability density function | ||
| mapping from energy space into detector pulse height (or position) space |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Description: A dataset that records the probability density function mapping from energy space into detector pulse height (or position) space in a NASA OGIP Redistribution Matrix File compliant format.
|
|
||
| Relationships: narrower than #response-function | ||
|
|
||
| Used-in: Chandra response data products ? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Used-in: Chandra response data products ? | |
| Used-in: Chandra Source Catalog RMF data products (https://cxc.cfa.harvard.edu/csc/), XMM data products |
| Additional Property:(dimensionality: [M.T^-3]) | ||
| Rationale: Distinguish between flux of particles and flux of energy. | ||
|
|
||
| Used_in: %todo provide an example site or file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Used_in: Chandra Source Catalog (https://cxc.cfa.harvard.edu/csc/) aperture photometry probability density function data product include counts flux, photon (particle) flux, and energy fluxes
| Discussion: same as for phys.flux.density | ||
| can we use instead "phys.flux;phys.count;em.energy;instr.sr", leading to the removal | ||
| of this term of the UCD list? never clear whether we multiply by em.energy or divide... | ||
| Isn't phys.flux already per unit of surface area ? Has the same dimensionality as phys.flux.density |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In astronomy, flux, flux density, and flux density surface brightness are all different quantities. Flux is the amount of (energy, particles, ... ) detected from a source per unit time passing through a unit area. The (energy, particles, ...) defines whether it is an energy flux (the default understanding of the term in astronomy unless otherwise specified), particle (most commonly photon) flux, etc. Flux density is the flux per unit in the spectral direction (e.g., per unit frequency, per unit wavelength, per unit energy). Flux density surface brightness is the flux density per unit surface area of the source, if the source is not a point source; so for an extended emission source the surface brightness is typically defined per square arcsec or per square degree.
| Used_in: %todo provide an example site or file | ||
| Rationale: | ||
| ???? | ||
| Discussion: can we use instead "phys.flux;phys.count;instr.sr"? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see instr.sr in the UCD List, but in any case this is nothing to do with the instrument. It's the distribution over the source resolved are that matters.
| Section 5.4. Excess rms-flux correlation | ||
|
|
||
| Discussion: TBD in semantics & HEIG | ||
| Propose stat.error.below instead of stat.error.negative ( Mireille) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Below" can be ambiguous in cases where the quantity varies with the opposite sign of the measure. For example, as surface brightness increases, the measured surface magnitude decreases.
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Discussion: | ||
| Propose stat.error.above instead of stat.error.positive ( Mireille & Sebastien) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same comment as for stat.error.below.
| J. Schnabel (ECAP, \href{mailto:jutta.schnabel@fau.de}{jutta.schnabel@fau.de}), | ||
| I. Evans (SAO/CXC, \href{mailto:ievans@cfa.harvard.edu}{ievans@cfa.harvard.edu},\\ | ||
| M. Servillat (LUX - Observatoire de Paris, \href{mailto:mathieu.servillat@obspm.fr}{mathieu.servillat@obspm.fr},\\ | ||
| B. Khélifi (APC - Université de Paris Cité/CNRS, \href{mailto:khelifi@in2p3.fr}{khelifi@in2p3.fr}),\\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| B. Khélifi (APC - Université de Paris Cité/CNRS, \href{mailto:khelifi@in2p3.fr}{khelifi@in2p3.fr}),\\ | |
| B. Kh\'elifi (APC - Universit\'e de Paris Cit\'e/CNRS, \href{mailto:khelifi@in2p3.fr}{khelifi@in2p3.fr}),\\ |
| M. Servillat (LUX - Observatoire de Paris, \href{mailto:mathieu.servillat@obspm.fr}{mathieu.servillat@obspm.fr},\\ | ||
| B. Khélifi (APC - Université de Paris Cité/CNRS, \href{mailto:khelifi@in2p3.fr}{khelifi@in2p3.fr}),\\ | ||
| J. Evans (SAO/CXC, \href{mailto:janet@cfa.harvard.edu}{janet@cfa.harvard.edu}),\\ | ||
| M. Louys (CDS and ICube - Université de Strasbourg, \href{mailto:mireille.louys@unistra.fr}{mireille.louys@unistra.fr}),\\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| M. Louys (CDS and ICube - Université de Strasbourg, \href{mailto:mireille.louys@unistra.fr}{mireille.louys@unistra.fr}),\\ | |
| M. Louys (CDS and ICube - Universit\'e de Strasbourg, \href{mailto:mireille.louys@unistra.fr}{mireille.louys@unistra.fr}),\\ |
| C. Boisson (LUX - Observatoire de Paris, \href{mailto:catherine.boisson@obspm.fr}{catherine.boisson@obspm.fr}),\\ | ||
| M. Cresitello-Dittmar (SAO/CXC, \href{mailto:mdittmar@cfa.harvard.edu}{mdittmar@cfa.harvard.edu}),\\ | ||
| O. Ates (LUX - ObsParis, \href{mailto:onur.ates@obspm.fr}{onur.ates@obspm.fr}),\\ | ||
| K. Kosack (IRFU - CEA/Université Paris-Saclay, \href{mailto:karl.kosack@cea.fr}{karl.kosack@cea.fr}),\\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| K. Kosack (IRFU - CEA/Université Paris-Saclay, \href{mailto:karl.kosack@cea.fr}{karl.kosack@cea.fr}),\\ | |
| K. Kosack (IRFU - CEA/Universit\'e Paris-Saclay, \href{mailto:karl.kosack@cea.fr}{karl.kosack@cea.fr}),\\ |
3 participants
I am trying to fix the workflow.
let's test first that the document is properly generated . then in the next iterations we can fix the other changes proposed in the various commits.