Skip to content

Fix Answer-length contradiction in research-report - #2

Open
jstoadv wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-research-report-answer-length
Open

Fix Answer-length contradiction in research-report#2
jstoadv wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-research-report-answer-length

Conversation

@jstoadv

@jstoadv jstoadv commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Fork-side copy of Battle-Creek-LLC#10.

RULES says the Answer section is "the one-line bottom line" (artifacts/research-report.md:10); SHAPE says <2–3 sentences: the conclusion and its confidence> (:16).

Drops the length claim from RULES; SHAPE unchanged. Two rules already need the longer form: SHAPE asks for conclusion + confidence, and AVOID (:30) forbids "a teaser Answer that defers the conclusion to the Synthesis section".

Expected behavioural impact: none. Consistency fix.

RULES said the Answer section is "the one-line bottom line"; SHAPE said
"2-3 sentences: the conclusion and its confidence". An agent parsing the
rule and an agent copying the skeleton produced different artifacts.

Drop the length claim from RULES and keep SHAPE. Two rules in the file
already require the longer form: SHAPE asks the Answer to carry the
conclusion and its confidence, and AVOID forbids "a teaser Answer that
defers the conclusion to the Synthesis section" — pinning to one line
would push the conclusion into Synthesis. The length claim was also
incidental to what that sentence is for, which is what goes where.
@jstockdi

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closing: this targets the fork's own main, not Battle-Creek-LLC/tamos. The change landed upstream instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants