Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @cwrau. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
aaeb1a0 to
81a7702
Compare
|
Hello, anything I can do to help this getting reviewed? |
|
Hello, is there something I can do to get this merged? |
81a7702 to
708e56f
Compare
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
|
Still waiting for review... |
708e56f to
0e667c6
Compare
|
/ok-to-test |
234u34k
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Blocking default-values regression; reproduction and requested test are documented inline.
0e667c6 to
c52e1c9
Compare
234u34k
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Confirmed on c52e1c93. The hostMount path is restored in both templates and the checks pass. This addresses my requested change, thank you
c52e1c9 to
89904d7
Compare
3ab8cd8 to
c4d52e4
Compare
|
/assign @stephenfin |
|
I think it would be great to describe this feature and its use case in |
c4d52e4 to
fc2656c
Compare
fc2656c to
53f1f29
Compare
|
relates to #2655 |
|
/remove-lifecycle stale |
|
/lgtm |
| path: /etc/config | ||
| {{- end }} | ||
| {{- with .Values.csi.plugin.volumes }} | ||
| {{- with .Values.splitMode.enabled | ternary .Values.splitMode.volumes .Values.csi.plugin.volumes }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The ternary makes it that splitMode completely ignores .Values.csi.plugin.volumes in favor of .Values.splitMode.volumes. That might be confusing. Consider merging rather than replacing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That won't work sadly, as one cannot remove an entry from the volumes and with the splitMode you don't want the /etc/cacert
53f1f29 to
e15e433
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This allows the user to deploy the controller-manager split between the management cluster and the workload cluster.
Signed-off-by: Chris Werner Rau <cwrau@cwrau.info>
e15e433 to
bfd7a90
Compare
|
My rebase off of master cleared the lgtm, @kayrus, could you review again please? 🙏 |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This allows the user to deploy the controller-manager split between the
management cluster and the workload cluster.
That way one can keep all openstack credentials out of the workload cluster.
Release note: