Skip to content

fix(entry-skills): every handoff arm says to invoke the skill#552

Open
leeovery wants to merge 1 commit into
docs/contributingfrom
fix/spec-entry-bugfix-invoke
Open

fix(entry-skills): every handoff arm says to invoke the skill#552
leeovery wants to merge 1 commit into
docs/contributingfrom
fix/spec-entry-bugfix-invoke

Conversation

@leeovery

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • A prose-test walker on the bugfix path recorded a DEVIATION: the arm hands over a fenced block of arguments and never says what to do with it — no invocation directive, and no directive to emit it either. Reproduced identically on both independent walks, against the already-fixed fences, so it isn't a rendering artefact.
  • Enumerating before fixing turned one arm into four, across three files:
file arm
workflow-specification-entry #### If work_type is bugfix
workflow-specification-entry #### If work_type is cross-cutting
workflow-investigation-entry #### If source is continue
workflow-planning-entry #### If continuing or reviewing existing plan
  • In every case a sibling arm in the same file carries the sentence and these don't. discussion-entry and research-entry carry it on every arm — the same proof structure that settled the fence bug: two files doing it correctly means the others are omissions, not house style.

Test plan

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Found by a prose-test walker on the bugfix path: the arm hands over a
fenced block of arguments and never says what to do with it — no
invocation directive, and no directive to emit it either. Reproduced on
both independent walks against the already-fixed fences, so it is not a
rendering artefact.

Enumerating before fixing turned one arm into four, across three files:
specification-entry's `bugfix` and `cross-cutting`, investigation-entry's
`continue`, and planning-entry's `continuing or reviewing`. In each case
a sibling arm in the same file carries the sentence and these do not.
discussion-entry and research-entry carry it on every arm, which is what
shows this is an omission rather than a house style — the same proof
that settled the fences.

Additions only; the fences were re-verified intact afterwards.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant