-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
[kyb] add issuing authority to IDs #480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -13,3 +13,7 @@ properties: | |
| type: string | ||
| description: Country that issued the identification (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2) | ||
| example: US | ||
| issuingAuthority: | ||
| type: string | ||
| description: Name of the government agency or organization that issued the identification | ||
| example: U.S. Department of State | ||
|
Comment on lines
+16
to
+19
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Prompt To Fix With AIThis is a comment left during a code review.
Path: openapi/components/schemas/customers/PersonalIdentification.yaml
Line: 16-19
Comment:
`PersonalIdentification.yaml` appears to be unreferenced — searching the entire `openapi/` directory (and the bundled `openapi.yaml` / `mintlify/openapi.yaml`) returns no `$ref` pointing to this schema. That means the `issuingAuthority` field added here won't surface in the generated API spec at all. If this schema is intentionally a "stub" for future use, it's fine to leave it, but the change has no current effect on the API surface. If it was expected to be the canonical definition shared by the beneficial-owner schemas, those schemas would need to reference it via `$ref` instead of inlining the identification fields.
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise. |
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be required?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it will be in the future (https://lightspark.atlassian.net/browse/AT-5270), but I want to add it to the dashboard first and test while it's still optional