fix(dfm-search): extend semantic filetype suffix coverage#354
Conversation
extend semantic filetype suffix coverage Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-370203.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @Johnson-zs, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.
Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Johnson-zs The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
deepin pr auto review★ 总体评分:100分■ 【总体评价】
■ 【详细分析】
■ 【改进建议代码示例】 // 代码已非常完善,无需额外修复。 |
|
/forcemerge |
|
This pr force merged! (status: blocked) |
extend semantic filetype suffix coverage
Bug: https://pms.uniontech.com/bug-view-370203.html