[BUG] High CPU usage at random moments

Is there an existing issue for this?

I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

Hello, this is a recreation of the very similar bug report link.

I have not seen the errors in the logfiles and unfortunately I can't recheck them. But the symptoms are the same as in the before mentioned tickets just at random times.

I've had it occur twice over the past 5 days, the container just randomly starts using a lot of CPU resources and Nextcloud becomes unavailable. The only thing that seems to resolve it is restarting the container.

Example of the CPU spike on the server in question:

Expected Behavior

No CPU usage spike and application remaining available.

Steps To Reproduce

It seems to be happening randomly.

Environment

OS: 
Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS

Image: 
lscr.io/linuxserver/nextcloud:33.0.3-ls428

Environment:
k3s (previously experienced the exact configuration in docker as well)

CPU architecture

x86-64

Docker creation

k3s manifest:
: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: nextcloud
  namespace: cloud
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: nextcloud
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: nextcloud
    spec:
      containers:
        - name: nextcloud
          image: lscr.io/linuxserver/nextcloud:33.0.3-ls428
          ports:
            - containerPort: 80
          envFrom:
            - secretRef:
                name: cloud-nextcloud
          volumeMounts:
            - name: config
              mountPath: /config
            - name: custom-apps
              mountPath: /app/www/public/custom_apps
            - name: documents
              mountPath: /documents
            - name: pictures
              mountPath: /pictures
            - name: games
              mountPath: /games
            - name: it
              mountPath: /IT
            - name: ebooks
              mountPath: /ebooks
            - name: data
              mountPath: /data


Which is the k3s equivalent of this docker-compose snippet:

  nextcloud:
    image: lscr.io/linuxserver/nextcloud:33.0.3-ls428
    healthcheck:
      test: ["CMD", "curl", "https://wolkje.heijlond.com/index.php/login"]
      timeout: 2s
      interval: 30s
      retries: 1
    environment:
      - PUID=2008
      - PGID=2008
      - TZ=Europe/London
    depends_on:
      - redis
    volumes:
<same mounts>

Container logs

I am working on a way of saving logs to be able to check/paste them. But the previous bug report linked contains logs etc.

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

Just came here to support this. I run almost an identical setup, my OS is Debian 13 + same Docker compose.

I have the exact same issue. Daily 1x high CPU usage for 1h and no apparent reason other than php process.
If I go back in Proxmox logs it's been going on for a while. Can't narrow down when it started, but at least a couple of months if not longer. I usually keep to latest nextcloud image by linuxserver.

upstream nextcloud-repo has a similar issue ticket

nextcloud/server#59036

for me it renders my nextcloud completely unusable and i have to restart it..

I think its better we go to the upstream repo issues and request support there.

Or am i wrong annd they are different issues ?

upstream nextcloud-repo has a similar issue ticket

nextcloud/server#59036

for me it renders my nextcloud completely unusable and i have to restart it..

I think its better we go to the upstream repo issues and request support there.

Or am i wrong annd they are different issues ?

I am unsure, didn't the upstream Nextcloud devs resolve it or something?

your linuxserver-nextcloud image version is oudated.
we are at lscr.io/linuxserver/nextcloud:version-33.0.4
which is Linuxserver.io version:- 33.0.4-ls433 Build-date:- 2026-05-28T18:26:57+00:00
ID | sha256:a1208ad00ce8228de38d60fcbeacae3fe895c21a49192c927f1294d4c4076abf

upstream nextcloud-repo has a similar issue ticket
nextcloud/server#59036
for me it renders my nextcloud completely unusable and i have to restart it..
I think its better we go to the upstream repo issues and request support there.
Or am i wrong annd they are different issues ?

I am unsure, didn't the upstream Nextcloud devs resolve it or something?

i am not aware of any resolution of this bug at the upstream nextcloud repo.
As far as i know is neither the cause nor a workaround known.
Its still possible these are different issues.
nextcloud/server#59036

your linuxserver-nextcloud image version is oudated. we are at lscr.io/linuxserver/nextcloud:version-33.0.4 which is Linuxserver.io version:- 33.0.4-ls433 Build-date:- 2026-05-28T18:26:57+00:00 ID | sha256:a1208ad00ce8228de38d60fcbeacae3fe895c21a49192c927f1294d4c4076abf

You're right, I copy/pasted the wrong image. I was already using the 33.0.4:ls433. But I updated it in the running config rather than in the k3s manifest I copied from into the opening post.

Thanks for pointing that out though!

I keep having this issue from time to time with podman under fedora 44 and daily auto updates of the image. I dunno what's causing it, as usually the container seems unable to respond. Usually it happens randomly and a manual restart of the container fixes it, but it keeps coming up multiple times a month, so it is annoying.

I'm gonna compare config.php files at work tomorrow, as for some reason it only happens to one of my two instances

Compared config files today. Except that loglevel was set to 2 instead of 1 they seemed pretty much identical. I dunno if this might be related, but I use the preview generator addon, to get preview images of video files etc through ffmpeg.

Hi All. Same issue with docker running on Debian, service stuck and huge CPU usage. Restarting the container fixes the issue.

Unfortunately I don't have any additional detail to help to debug the issue. I think this looks like the issue is the mainstream repository, since when the CPU usage spikes, the process consuming it is the internal php-fpm binary from nextcloud.

I will try to get more details the next time if I have the chance.

might explain why it doesn't happen on my other instance, as that one is running on arm, while the faulty one is x86. So it could be a bug with the php-fpm version.

Hi all, I'm running 34.0.0-ls438 on unraid experiencing the same issue. Nothing on the logs other than high cpu usage up to 50 - 70%. Oddly enough, i noticed cospend (although is not enabled in settings) was out of date, and updating it seemed to have calmed it down. Unsure if related but thought worth mentioning. Will report back if the CPU load issue resurfaces and I get more data to share.

@jaychu

inspired by you @jaychu I disabled an app (epubviewer that has not been updated for several months) - i am running 33.0.5 - and the CPU usages calmed down. Let's see if it is related, but generally many Nextcloud problems are related to apps

I've finally set up a redis with valkey after noticing that without the preview generator app working under 34 my instance got super unusable in general as it had to regenerate all previews for some reason. Maybe this might give some benefits for this as well?

No need to repeat what everyone else is saying here - seeing this same issue with container on my Unraid server, too.

I am sorry but your reply refers to my previous posts ? If yes, i don't really get what i am repeating exactly, i am suggesting (AI but still) a fix that seems to be the root cause of the issue, i haven't seen any suggestion for similar fixes in the previous posts, unless i missed it (i am talking about the bullet "Suggested changes to the image")
By the way, i posted my replies more than a week ago, i can confirm that on the instances where i applied the fix, i did not have the issue anymore, on a single instance i did not patch, i got the issue this night. That suggests for now, that this fix is valid. Of course, if the team gives it a bless. I will continue to monitor it that way, and will report.

I am sorry but your reply refers to my previous posts ? If yes, i don't really get what i am repeating exactly, i am suggesting (AI but still) a fix that seems to be the root cause of the issue, i haven't seen any suggestion for similar fixes in the previous posts, unless i missed it (i am talking about the bullet "Suggested changes to the image")

I read it as: "There's no need for me to give a big explanation, which just repeats what everyone here has been saying". :)

By the way, i posted my replies more than a week ago, i can confirm that on the instances where i applied the fix, i did not have the issue anymore, on a single instance i did not patch, i got the issue this night. That suggests for now, that this fix is valid.

Maybe it's time to open up a PR, then? :)

@4liceD

Just to note, there is an open PR for this that was provided by @4liceD ( #542 )

PR's used to get auto built so the submitter and/or we could test what was submitted, unfortunately we changed that recently due to some security concerns.

Originally it did seem that this issue was related to a nextcloud bug but that might be the case since there have been more recent which had supposedly fixed the bug but it seems to still exist.

I do need to get around to upgrading my personal instance to latest and see if I experience the same issues.

I am sorry but your reply refers to my previous posts ? If yes, i don't really get what i am repeating exactly, i am suggesting (AI but still) a fix that seems to be the root cause of the issue, i haven't seen any suggestion for similar fixes in the previous posts, unless i missed it (i am talking about the bullet "Suggested changes to the image")

I read it as: "There's no need for me to give a big explanation, which just repeats what everyone here has been saying". :)

By the way, i posted my replies more than a week ago, i can confirm that on the instances where i applied the fix, i did not have the issue anymore, on a single instance i did not patch, i got the issue this night. That suggests for now, that this fix is valid.

Maybe it's time to open up a PR, then? :)

I am not against opening the PR, but i would suggest something i did not really made myself, but AI. I would just have checked it, is that tolerable ?

I have had this happening too, I edited /php/www2.conf to

pm.max_children = 4
pm.start_servers = 4
pm.min_spare_servers = 2
pm.max_spare_servers = 4
pm.max_requests = 500

And I haven't had it happening since.

Mine is running on an old i7-4790K with 6 out of 8 threads available to the container.

feat: disable opcache.jit due to crashes

I have had this happening too, I edited /php/www2.conf to
pm.max_children = 4
pm.start_servers = 4
pm.min_spare_servers = 2
pm.max_spare_servers = 4
pm.max_requests = 500
And I haven't had it happening since.

Mine is running on an old i7-4790K with 6 out of 8 threads available to the container.

Mine says this? And it’s still doing it

pm = dynamic
pm.max_children = 660
pm.start_servers = 355
pm.min_spare_servers = 305
pm.max_spare_servers = 455
pm.max_requests = 500

@ErikDB87

Better data than I had last week. I run four of these instances. Three have had opcache.jit disabled since 16 Aug and haven't had a single incident since. The fourth one I simply forgot to patch, and it went to 100% CPU again yesterday and needed the usual restart. Not a deliberate control group, but it's the same split @ErikDB87 described: patched fine, unpatched dies.

On the patched one that used to fail most often, php-fpm has restarted 8 times since, including the weekly logrotate restarts on 23 and 30 Aug, which is exactly the event that used to set it off. Zero upstream timed out in nginx. Before the fix it was roughly one incident every two or three restarts.

On the pool settings, I think the thread has answered that one by itself. @Th3M1k3y is at max_children = 4 and hasn't seen it since; @blaine07 is at 660 and still gets it. I've had it at 5, at 20 and at 120, and I already had pm.max_requests = 500 set when it last blew up. That's the whole range from 4 to 660 with the same failure, so I don't think worker count is the variable.

It fits mechanically too: a worker stuck in an infinite loop never finishes its request, so max_requests never recycles it, and with request_terminate_timeout at 0 fpm never kills it either. What the worker count changes is where the damage lands. With 120 my whole host went to load 117; with 4 on a smaller box Nextcloud still dies but the machine stays usable, so it looks better than it is. And a few days without a crash is unfortunately inside the normal gap between incidents, which is what has made this so hard to pin down. Several of us (me included) have "fixed" it more than once already.

@blaine07 unrelated to the bug, but pm.start_servers = 355 will spawn 355 workers at startup and hold at least 305 idle. That's a lot of RAM for no gain, and it hands this bug 355 processes to chew through. Worth bringing back down whatever else you do.

@ErikDB87 you nudged me to open a PR, so I did: #545, for the JIT change. It's complementary to #542 (request_terminate_timeout), which is worth merging too, but that one is a seatbelt rather than a fix: it turns a total outage into a slow instance, it doesn't prevent the miscompilation.

@mauro2306

Better data than I had last week. I run four of these instances. Three have had opcache.jit disabled since 16 Aug and haven't had a single incident since. The fourth one I simply forgot to patch, and it went to 100% CPU again yesterday and needed the usual restart. Not a deliberate control group, but it's the same split @ErikDB87 described: patched fine, unpatched dies.

On the patched one that used to fail most often, php-fpm has restarted 8 times since, including the weekly logrotate restarts on 23 and 30 Aug, which is exactly the event that used to set it off. Zero upstream timed out in nginx. Before the fix it was roughly one incident every two or three restarts.

On the pool settings, I think the thread has answered that one by itself. @Th3M1k3y is at max_children = 4 and hasn't seen it since; @blaine07 is at 660 and still gets it. I've had it at 5, at 20 and at 120, and I already had pm.max_requests = 500 set when it last blew up. That's the whole range from 4 to 660 with the same failure, so I don't think worker count is the variable.

It fits mechanically too: a worker stuck in an infinite loop never finishes its request, so max_requests never recycles it, and with request_terminate_timeout at 0 fpm never kills it either. What the worker count changes is where the damage lands. With 120 my whole host went to load 117; with 4 on a smaller box Nextcloud still dies but the machine stays usable, so it looks better than it is. And a few days without a crash is unfortunately inside the normal gap between incidents, which is what has made this so hard to pin down. Several of us (me included) have "fixed" it more than once already.

@blaine07 unrelated to the bug, but pm.start_servers = 355 will spawn 355 workers at startup and hold at least 305 idle. That's a lot of RAM for no gain, and it hands this bug 355 processes to chew through. Worth bringing back down whatever else you do.

@ErikDB87 you nudged me to open a PR, so I did: #545, for the JIT change. It's complementary to #542 (request_terminate_timeout), which is worth merging too, but that one is a seatbelt rather than a fix: it turns a total outage into a slow instance, it doesn't prevent the miscompilation.

@mauro2306 sorry a little OT.

What would you recommend I go to here?

pm = dynamic
pm.max_children = 660
pm.start_servers = 355
pm.min_spare_servers = 305
pm.max_spare_servers = 455
pm.max_requests = 500

@blaine07

@blaine07 This issue affected my instance constantly for quite a while. Based on an earlier comment, I added only the following lines to /config/php/php-local.ini a couple of weeks ago and have not seen the issue since:

opcache.jit=disable
opcache.jit_buffer_size=0

I'm currently running 34.0.3

php/php-src#21243
This seems to be an upstream php issue. i put the link above. Probably we can upgrade the php version or downgrade it to 8.3 to fix it.

I can confirm this issue, which occurs randomly after running add-on updates. In my case, all workers and the CPU are at full capacity, causing the website to display the message “No server available.”

Update: in my case updating the Mailapp as a part of an Bulkupdate seems to exeed workers

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

[BUG] High CPU usage at random moments #539

Is there an existing issue for this?

Current Behavior

Expected Behavior

Steps To Reproduce

Environment

CPU architecture

Docker creation

Container logs

19 remaining items

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

[BUG] High CPU usage at random moments #539

Description

Is there an existing issue for this?

Current Behavior

Expected Behavior

Steps To Reproduce

Environment

CPU architecture

Docker creation

Container logs

Activity

github-actions commented on Jun 1, 2026

arktisk-varg commented on Jun 1, 2026

perahoky commented on Jun 1, 2026

jerheij commented on Jun 1, 2026

perahoky commented on Jun 1, 2026

jerheij commented on Jun 1, 2026

4liceD commented on Jun 1, 2026

4liceD commented on Jun 2, 2026

shaggyz commented on Jun 7, 2026

4liceD commented on Jun 7, 2026

jaychu commented on Jun 21, 2026

TheNomad11 commented on Jun 21, 2026

4liceD commented on Jun 21, 2026

19 remaining items

mauro2306 commented on Aug 27, 2026

ErikDB87 commented on Aug 27, 2026

j0nnymoe commented on Aug 27, 2026

mauro2306 commented on Aug 27, 2026

Th3M1k3y commented on Aug 28, 2026

blaine07 commented on Sep 2, 2026

mauro2306 commented on Sep 3, 2026

blaine07 commented on Sep 3, 2026

mumbo2030 commented on Sep 4, 2026

Himyth commented on Sep 11, 2026

SchwarzeLanze commented on Sep 14, 2026

SchwarzeLanze commented on Sep 16, 2026

LinuxServer-CI commented on Oct 17, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions