playbooks: repo-sweep review has no route for bundled-skill or repo-sweep defects

[kyle-sexton]

Problem

skills/repo-sweep/reference/review.md lines 9-14 sort each problem into a skill defect (filed against the plugin that owns the skill) or a catalog problem. There is no route for:

• a defect in a bundled Claude Code skill (for example claude-api), which has no owning plugin to file against;
• a defect in repo-sweep's own scripts or procedure files (skill-version.sh, next.md), which is neither a catalog entry nor another plugin's skill.

Evidence

melodic-software/.github#153 review of step prompt-audit: the findings sat in repo-sweep's own scripts and next.md. They were filed by running /plugin-quality:audit on playbooks:repo-sweep, a route review.md does not name.

Fix

Add a third bullet to review.md step 2: repo-sweep defects (its scripts, SKILL.md, reference files) go through /plugin-quality:audit on playbooks:repo-sweep. Add one sentence saying a bundled-skill defect is reported to Anthropic (for example with /feedback), not filed in this repository.

[kyle-sexton]

This was generated by AI during triage.

Triage: verified, briefed

Verified. The repo-sweep review procedure's problem-sorting step names exactly two routes: a skill defect (audited with /plugin-quality:audit and filed against the plugin that owns the skill) and a catalog problem. Neither route fits a defect in a bundled Claude Code skill (no owning plugin in any repository) or a defect in repo-sweep's own procedure files or scripts. The claim holds on main.

Type: Feature. Priority: priority: medium (no deadline, blocks nothing).

Brief

Goal. Every problem the review action sorts has a named route.

Behavior to add to the review procedure's sort step:

1. A third route: a defect in repo-sweep itself (its SKILL.md, its reference files, its scripts) is audited by invoking /plugin-quality:audit on playbooks:repo-sweep with the problem as evidence, and drafted as an issue against this repository's playbooks plugin, kept separate from catalog problems.
2. One sentence: a defect in a skill bundled with Claude Code is reported to Anthropic rather than filed in this repository. If the sentence names a specific reporting command, verify that the command exists in current Claude Code documentation, and record that check the way the repo's skill-body rule requires for volatile specifics.

Acceptance.

• The sort step names three routes plus the bundled-skill sentence, and no other step changes.
• The approval gate (show drafts, file only after the user approves) covers the new route unchanged.
• The skill's existing lint, eval, and script tests still pass.

Out of scope. Changing who does the reviewing. #4574 rewrites the same procedure to dispatch an independent reviewer that classifies problems into its own categories. The two items are independent, but whichever lands second must merge its route list with the other's.