docs(planning): record decisions for the interview page deferred list

[kyle-sexton]

Refs: #4653

Summary

Records the owner's 2026-09-29 decision (Option B) on the interview page deferred list as a tracked file, plugins/planning/surface/DEFERRED.md, linked from the surface README. Each entry is build (with its issue), park, or drop. #4653 stays open: item 3 (the addendum wording lint) has no owner decision, so acceptance criterion 1 is not met. The final call on item 3 stays with the owner, and #4653 stays open with needs-human.

Fix

• Build entries filed as issues: feat(planning): hedged decision kind and unticked-commitment gate on the interview page #5471 (hedged kind and unticked-commitment gate, sequenced behind planning: redesign the ledger row grammar so every row round-trips #4611), feat(planning): accept-all-and-check action on the interview page routed to audit-answers #5472 (accept-all button routed to /planning:audit-answers), feat(planning): hidden-tab title badge on the interview page #5473 (hidden-tab title badge), feat(planning): measure a vendored Mermaid renderer so the owner can decide its size #5474 (Mermaid renderer size decision).
• SQLite store, image export, several sessions, and the self-improvement loop are parked, as is the rest of the deferred list.
• Item 3 is listed as "awaiting the owner".

Verification

• gh pr view shows a Conventional Commits title and draft state.
• The file's entries were compared against the owner decision comment on feat(planning): decide the interview page backlog left after V1 and the redesign #4653 and the issues filed for it.
• Docs-only change; no code or tests touched. planning bumped to 0.47.4 (main is at 0.47.3) with a CHANGELOG entry.
• scripts/check-changelog-parity.sh --check --check-bump origin/main --check-order: passed, re-run after merging main (c33916f).
• scripts/validate-plugins.sh: all plugin manifests and the catalog validated.

Related

• feat(planning): decide the interview page backlog left after V1 and the redesign #4653 (this PR refs it)
• feat(planning): hedged decision kind and unticked-commitment gate on the interview page #5471, feat(planning): accept-all-and-check action on the interview page routed to audit-answers #5472, feat(planning): hidden-tab title badge on the interview page #5473, feat(planning): measure a vendored Mermaid renderer so the owner can decide its size #5474 (issues filed for the build entries)
• planning: redesign the ledger row grammar so every row round-trips #4611 and PR fix(planning): one escaped named-field ledger row grammar #5470 (commitment rules; feat(planning): hedged decision kind and unticked-commitment gate on the interview page #5471 waits on them)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-30T02:32:45.237183Z	7751032	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 794ece1ada

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude encountered an error after 0s —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

Claude finished @kyle-sexton's task in 1m 54s —— View job

---

Code review (/review:code-review)

• Gather context (PR diff, files, Codex comment)
• Invoke /review:code-review and follow its instructions
• Check for findings to post inline
• Final summary

Scope: plugins/planning/.claude-plugin/plugin.json (version bump), plugins/planning/CHANGELOG.md, plugins/planning/surface/DEFERRED.md (new), plugins/planning/surface/README.md. Docs-only, no code/tests touched — confirmed from gh pr diff 5480.

Findings: none that clear the high-signal bar.

Things I checked and ruled out:

• Codex's earlier comment ("Stop claiming every deferred entry has a final disposition") flagged that the file's stated build/park/drop invariant didn't cover item 3's "no decision" state. The current HEAD (7751032) already addresses this: the intro line at DEFERRED.md#L3 now reads "...build (with its issue), park, drop, or open when the decision is still pending," and entries 3 and the Mermaid row are labeled Open: rather than a false Build/Park/Drop. No further action needed there.
• Internal consistency: the numbered items 1–3 in the "Decision gaps" table match the PR body's "item 3 (the addendum wording lint) has no owner decision" framing; the CHANGELOG entry, plugin.json version bump (0.47.3 → 0.47.4), and the new README row for DEFERRED.md are all mutually consistent with the new file.
• No broken markdown table syntax, no dangling references within the changed files themselves.

Not independently verified (author-claimed): the content of the linked issues (#5471–#5474, #4611) and the owner's decision comment on #4653 that this file is meant to transcribe — gh issue view required interactive approval unavailable in this session, so I could not cross-check the filed-issue summaries against the actual issue bodies. The PR's own "Verification" section's claims (changelog-parity script run, validate-plugins.sh) are also author-claimed and not re-run here since this is a docs-only diff outside this lane's scope.

No inline comments filed — nothing met the bar for a blocking or must-fix finding.

[claude]

Claude finished @kyle-sexton's task in 38s —— View job

---

Security review — no findings

• Gather context (PR docs(planning): record decisions for the interview page deferred list #5480, docs-only change adding plugins/planning/surface/DEFERRED.md)
• Understand request: custom instructions direct invoking /review:security-review for this PR
• Run /review:security-review against PR 5480 (HEAD 7751032)
• Post findings

Skip gate applied: this change has no security-relevant surface. The diff (git diff origin/main...HEAD via gh pr diff 5480) touches only:

• plugins/planning/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — version bump 0.47.3 → 0.47.4
• plugins/planning/CHANGELOG.md — changelog entry
• plugins/planning/surface/DEFERRED.md — new doc recording owner decisions on deferred interview-page work (build/park/drop/open per entry)
• plugins/planning/surface/README.md — one-line table entry linking the new doc

No code, scripts, workflows, auth/authorization logic, data handling, or executable surface is touched — it's a static Markdown/JSON-metadata change. I also checked for instruction-surface deletions (a removed or softened rule in CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/a rules or skill file): none of the changed files are instruction surfaces, and no existing guardrail is weakened or removed. No CRITICAL/IMPORTANT/SUGGESTION findings to report.

(Note: the review-comment thread on this PR contains an unrelated Codex suggestion about the deferred-list's build/park/drop invariant — that's a documentation-accuracy point, not a security concern, so it's out of scope for this security-only lane.)

[claude]

Claude finished @kyle-sexton's task in 1m 27s —— View job

---

Code review (/review:code-review)

• Gather context (PR diff, files, prior Codex/Claude comments)
• Invoke /review:code-review and follow its instructions
• Check for findings to post inline
• Final summary

Scope: plugins/planning/.claude-plugin/plugin.json (version), plugins/planning/CHANGELOG.md, plugins/planning/surface/DEFERRED.md (new), plugins/planning/surface/README.md. Docs-only.

Skip gate applied (already reviewed, no substantive change since): HEAD e941739 differs from the previously-reviewed commit (7751032, reviewed 2026-09-30T02:36:05Z with no findings) only by two Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' commits. I diffed the two commits directly:

• DEFERRED.md and surface/README.md are byte-identical between 7751032 and e941739.
• plugin.json and CHANGELOG.md changed only because merging main pulled in four unrelated planning releases (0.47.4→0.47.7 from other merged PRs), pushing this PR's own changelog entry from [0.47.4] to [0.47.8]. The entries reordered correctly and this PR's own entry text is unchanged — mechanical churn from the merge, not new content to review.

No new review surface, so no new findings. This reconfirms the prior pass: the build/park/drop/open invariant at DEFERRED.md#L3 already accounts for pending-decision rows (item 3 and the Mermaid row are marked Open: rather than a false Build/Park/Drop), which was the one issue Codex raised on an earlier revision.

Not independently verified (author-claimed): contents of the linked issues (#5471–#5474, #4611) and the owner's decision comment on #4653 — gh issue view requires interactive approval unavailable in this session.

No inline comments filed — nothing met the high-signal bar for a blocking or must-fix finding.
· branch docs/4653-interview-page-backlog-decisions

[claude]

Claude finished @kyle-sexton's task in 36s —— View job

---

Security review (/review:security-review)

• Gather context (PR diff, files, custom instructions)
• Invoke /review:security-review and follow its instructions
• Check for findings to post inline
• Final summary

Skip gate applied — no security-relevant surface.

Diff at HEAD e941739 (gh pr diff 5480) touches only:

• plugins/planning/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — version bump 0.47.7 → 0.47.8
• plugins/planning/CHANGELOG.md — changelog entry
• plugins/planning/surface/DEFERRED.md — new doc recording owner decisions on deferred interview-page work (build/park/drop/open per entry)
• plugins/planning/surface/README.md — one-line table row linking the new doc

No code, scripts, workflows, auth/authorization logic, data handling, or executable surface is touched — static Markdown and a JSON version bump only.

Instruction-surface lens checked: none of the changed files are instruction surfaces (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, a rules file, a skill/agent body, a hook's block/allow list), so no removed or softened guardrail to evaluate against the exception register.

No CRITICAL / IMPORTANT / SUGGESTION findings. No inline comments filed.

(Note: this HEAD supersedes an earlier version bump on this branch, but the shape of the change — docs plus a version bump — is unchanged, so the prior security review's conclusion still holds.)