Improve cluster sources bookkeeping - #2437
Draft
gavinevans wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Conversation
…t overwrite a higher precedence full input.
… stored in one forecast source.
gavinevans
force-pushed
the
mobt_1244_update_cluster_sources
branch
from
August 24, 2026 12:58
fbfc554 to
6b7b362
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to https://github.com/metoppv/mo-blue-team/issues/1244
Description
This builds on #2431 and #2435. Only this commit is actually relevant. This PR modifies the bookkeeping of the cluster_sources attribute within the RealizationClusterAndMatch plugin, so that a given forecast_period only appears in one forecast source, rather than below where 3600 appears in multiple forecast sources. This can cause an issue later, within the temporal interpolation, if there are more than two forecast sources, as it's not clear what we should be temporally interpolating between.
Testing: