Skip to content

Adds thread_cooldown for ?selfcontact - #3443

Merged
martinbndr merged 2 commits into
developmentfrom
users/martinbndr/selfcontactcooldown
Aug 8, 2026
Merged

Adds thread_cooldown for ?selfcontact#3443
martinbndr merged 2 commits into
developmentfrom
users/martinbndr/selfcontactcooldown

Conversation

@martinbndr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds cooldown checking to the ?selfcontact command to enforce the thread_cooldown configuration for both DMing the bot and using that command.

Adds cooldown checking to the ?selfcontact command to enforce the `thread_cooldown` configuration for both DMing the bot and using that command.
@StephenDaDev
StephenDaDev requested a review from a team July 12, 2026 02:53
@StephenDaDev StephenDaDev added the bug This is a confirmed bug label Jul 12, 2026

@StephenDaDev StephenDaDev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good to me. I deployed to a testing instance and it works as intended without any other issues.

@StephenDaDev
StephenDaDev requested a review from a team July 19, 2026 02:56
@martinbndr
martinbndr requested review from lorenzo132 and sebkuip July 27, 2026 22:41

@sebkuip sebkuip left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@martinbndr
martinbndr enabled auto-merge (rebase) August 6, 2026 20:17
@martinbndr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Another review needed. @lorenzo132

@martinbndr
martinbndr merged commit d5fa99b into development Aug 8, 2026
4 checks passed
@martinbndr
martinbndr deleted the users/martinbndr/selfcontactcooldown branch August 8, 2026 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug This is a confirmed bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants