Add meeting notes for Node.js Web Team on 2026-07-06

meetings/2026-07-06.md

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# Node.js Web Team Meeting 2026-07-06
+
+## Links
+
+* GitHub Issue: <https://github.com/nodejs/web-team/issues/150>
+
+## Present
+
+* Brian Muenzenmeyer @bmuenzenmeyer
+* Matt Cowley @MattIPv4
+
+### Observers/Guests
+
+_None._
+
+## Agenda
+
+### Announcements
+
+_No announcements._
+
+### Issues and Pull Requests
+
+Extracted from **web-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting.
+
+#### nodejs/nodejs.org
+
+* Define how partners should be ranked [#8995](https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/issues/8995)
+  * https://nodejs.org/en/about/partners
+  * Reference: https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/public/static/partners/constants.json
+  * Brian could not find anything regarding historic precedence.
+  * Agreement from Matt that this needs to get written down.
+  * Do the categories equate to weights? Can some algorithm derive this?
+  * Should we split `infrastructure` into perhaps 3 - distribution, build, website (in order)
+  * Why do we have `security` and `ESP`? https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/types/partners.ts#L32C2-L32C3
+  * Security category is missing entirely from https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/docs/partners.md
+  * Proposal (weights out of 10):
+      * (Delete) Security
+      * (Delete) Release
+      * (4) ESP
+      * (10) Distribution
+      * (6) Web site
+      * (8) Build
+  * ensure weight and logo display is driven off of the above
+  * How is https://nodejs.org/en/download derived?
+  * Some partners don't even have a category https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blob/main/apps/site/public/static/partners/constants.json#L63
+  * Some partners (especially website), are missing... like Sentry, Crowdin, Chromatic, etc.
+  * How should we relate to https://github.com/nodejs/build#infrastructure-providers
+
+
+#### nodejs/doc-kit
+
+* ci: adopt Changesets for versioning and publishing [#855](https://github.com/nodejs/doc-kit/pull/855)
+  * Verbal discussion: agreement that this is better than what we have today (no git tags, no GitHub Releases, no CHANGELOG.md)
+* chore(monorepo): break out generators [#778](https://github.com/nodejs/doc-kit/pull/778)
+  * wait for other maintainer input
+
+#### nodejs/node
+
+* build, doc: move to redesign [#62045](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/62045)
+    * special mention of proposal to add beta docs to the website proper https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/pull/8998
+    * current blocker is all page OOM
+    * this was removed from tsc-agenda. why?
+* Render "About this documentation" as the landing page for the documentation section [#60667](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/60667)
+  * https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/documentation.html is not the same as https://beta.docs.nodejs.org/documentation.html
+  * Concatenated stability index
+
+## Q&A, Other
+
+## Upcoming Meetings
+
+* **Calendar**: <https://nodejs.org/calendar>
+
+Click `Add to Google Calendar` at the bottom left to add to your own Google calendar.