Repository navigation
Seven smaller things a real user hits (from the 17.7.0 browser pass): legal tabs shown to requesters, a template toggle with no template, renewal with no link, orphan drafts, a false demo note, an empty landing page for lawyers #99
Description
Ruled: 6398273819 · item 3 letter B · item 4 letter B · item 7 letter A · 2026-10-25T13:29:55Z
Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#25800 · objectstack-ai/objectstack#25801 · objectstack-ai/objectstack#25643
Filing class: ① product defects (user-visible), folded into one checklist card (filing cap); the seat splits it when dispatching. Reader: the repo:hotclm seat.
Source: the #87 full browser pass on 17.7.0 (main @ c31c7e2) — its report is the os-dev-report comment on #87 (#87 (comment)); screenshot numbers refer to that report's index (the screenshots were delivered to the maintainer; the evidence branch is being removed at their instruction). Finding 19 and the boot notes.
- Requester view switcher shows the legal tabs ("Awaiting Intake", "My Reviews", "7 more") and all three analytics dashboards including Legal Workbench (
012,124). - Wizard step 3 offers "Draft from template" on a contract type whose own text says it carries no template (
020). - Start Renewal creates the renewal draft (
renewed_fromset), toasts "Renewal draft created.", and leaves the user on the old contract with no link to the draft; the button stays (099). - An abandoned intake wizard (closed after step 3) leaves an orphan draft behind (NDA-2026-0021 in the run).
-
pnpm demore-run prints the first-run operator note again ("The seeded rows have no people on them yet … 我的合同 and 法务工作台 stay empty") after the accounts exist and the rows were handed over — false on a second run (scripts/demo.mjs). - A lawyer's landing page is the requester's "My Contracts" view, which is empty for a lawyer (
008). - Backfilled contract owner:
SUP-2026-0019is owned by the Records Manager who keyed it in, not by any business owner — decision-shaped; if the fix is not mechanical, stop withneeds_decision(relates to 34 backfilled contracts carry alegal_owner, andis_backfilledsays on the same row that no review ever happened #53).
Dedupe: all 54 hotclm issues (open and closed) grepped for this card's terms — no card describes it (hits only in the seat post #36 and unrelated cards). (terms: view switcher, Draft from template, orphan draft, renewed_from)
Filed by the repo:hotclm PM seat from the #87 browser pass.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 10, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 8
Session:
session_01HihZ11bQSqjCgjzHbpv4M1Account:
zhuangjianguo(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/issue-99-requester-navigationWorktree:
hotclm-issue-99Domain:
repo:hotclm(single-lane sister repo — nodomain:*)Seat:
repo:hotclm#1File surface:
src/apps/**·src/views/**— this dispatch covers items 1 (requester view switcher shows legal tabs and dashboards) and 6 (a lawyer's landing page is the requester's empty "My Contracts") only; items 2–5 and 7 touch held files and stay on the card (Part of #99) — stop on breach; explain in the reportContainer & model:
S,mode:subagent,model: opus(TIER_DEFAULT; hand-derived for a sister repo)Clause-②: no
Responsibility:
n/a — navigation defect in this app's own metadataThread-read: none
Serial constraints cleared: PR #91 (
src/objects/contract.hook.ts·src/flows/contract-intake.flow.ts·src/actions/contract-lifecycle.actions.ts), PR #101 (README.md·scripts/demo.mjs·src/flows/contract-approval.flow.ts), PR #102 (src/data/**), PR #92 / #81 (AGENTS.md) — all excluded from this surface; #95 dispatched in parallel on objects / dashboards / flows / translationsRead at: 2026-10-10T04:34Z
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 10, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 99, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-99-requester-navigation", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/hotclm/pull/104", "session": "session_01HihZ11bQSqjCgjzHbpv4M1", "premise_still_valid": true, "scope": "items 1 and 6 only (Part of #99); items 2-5 and 7 untouched", "summary": "One file, src/apps/clm.app.ts. Item 6: the four single-audience groups (Legal Desk, Finance, Execution & Records, Administration) now come before the shared My Contracts and Analytics, so Legal Counsel 1 opens on Awaiting Intake (6 rows) instead of an empty My Contracts; finance, records and clm_admin had the same defect and the same reorder fixes them; a requester's served tree is unchanged. Item 1: Legal Workbench and Finance Overview now carry clm_legal.access / clm_finance.access row gates, so a requester is no longer served them; Executive Overview stays ungated because the leadership rungs hold only clm_requester. The view-switcher half of item 1 is a platform gap (no audience gate on a list view or a dashboard), reported below with no workaround.", "zone2_measured": [ "Assumption 1 holds. No metadata key governs the view switcher: ListViewSchema (spec 17.7.0, 50 top-level keys) has nothing audience-shaped beyond sharing{type,lockedBy}; GET /api/v1/meta/view as Business Requester 1 returns all 11 clm_contract views; objectui ViewTabBar renders every list-family view from listViews(). The dashboards appeared because group_analytics was gated on clm_requester.access and its rows carried no gate; the governing key is the nav item's requiredPermissions, pruned per child server-side (filterAppForUserWithReason, @objectstack/rest 17.7.0, req.every).", "Assumption 2 holds. The console's findFirstRoute walks the SERVED navigation in declaration order and skips action/url/component rows (homePageId retired in spec 17.0.0). Every position binds clm_requester, so with group_my_contracts first every audience landed on my_contracts. The clm_requester binding (#11 Q2) was not touched." ], "rulings_applied": "Item 6: §05 does not literally name landing pages. I read it as pinning audience to partition (five groups, one per audience, each with a 主视图; 我的合同 marked 所有人), and the platform's first-served-row rule turns that into the landings. If the seat reads §05 otherwise, the fix is one array reorder to revert. Order inside each group is unchanged (§05's 导航 column).", "files_changed": [ "src/apps/clm.app.ts" ], "line_budget": "n/a", "gates": { "tree": "cad612f", "command": "OS_VERIFY_LOCK_SLOT=hotclm-issue-99-verify bash scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh -c 'pnpm verify' with output to a file and the exit code captured before any pipe; exit=0; 'VERDICT command-exit 0 · held the lock 19s · waited 0s'", "validate": "pass, '✓ Validation passed (1090ms)'; warnings are the pre-existing hierarchy-security plus six approval-approvers-may-resolve-empty", "lint": "pass, '6 suggestion(s) (1004ms)', all pre-existing on contract_approval", "typecheck": "pass, tsc --noEmit with no output (the && chain went on to the next gate)", "lint:i18n-gate": "pass, '✓ i18n gate · COVERAGE : 0 missing keys across 2 locale(s)'", "ci": "Validate on cad612f: completed success (push and pull_request runs), read once at report time" }, "tests": "No test suite in this repo beyond the four gates (CI runs the same four). Browser: Chromium 1194 at 1440x900, console login form, pnpm demo -- --port 3499. Both boots were passing: 'Plugins: 41 loaded', no degraded / no such table. BEFORE (46e65f0): requester1 and legal1 both landed on /_console/apps/clm/clm_contract/view/my_contracts; legal1's page read 'No matching records'; requester1's sidebar showed Analytics with Legal Workbench, Executive Overview and Finance Overview; switcher All Contracts · My Contracts · Awaiting Intake · My Reviews · 7 more. AFTER (cad612f, cold boot): legal1 landed on .../view/legal_intake with footer '6 records' (list request 200 total=6); requester1 landed on my_contracts (200 total=43) with Analytics showing Executive Overview only, switcher unchanged (platform finding P1); finance1 on all_payment_plans total=300; records1 on pending_execution total=6; clmadmin1 on clm_approval_rule total=6; exec1 on my_contracts total=0. Served-tree matrix for all six personas, before and after, is in the PR body. Positive control: legal1 is served Legal Workbench and finance1 Finance Overview. The console showed the same messages before and after: 401 get-session before sign-in, two registry warnings. A direct URL to dashboard/legal_workbench as requester1 still renders, row-scoped (3, own rows; clm_admin sees 6). No ablation: no gate or test was changed.", "evidence_files": "Screenshots and logs in the seat-readable scratchpad /tmp/claude-0/-home-user/e1694940-137d-56f8-bc26-8cb8aad03deb/scratchpad/issue-99/: before-requester1-landing.png, before-legal1-landing.png, after-{requester1,legal1,finance1,records1,clmadmin1,exec1}-landing.png, after-*-switcher-more.png, after-requester1-legal-workbench-direct-url.png, nav-{before,after}-*.json, verify1.log, demo-before.log, demo-after.log", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool used", "api_writes": "3 relay writes as objectstack-fleet[bot], each one repository_dispatch to objectstack-ai/objectstack carrying one action: (1) pr_create → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/hotclm/pulls (#104, read-back identical, 10837 bytes); (2) assign → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/hotclm/issues/104/assignees [zhuangjianguo] via label-write.mjs, read-back MATCHES; (3) comment → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/hotclm/issues/99/comments (this report). Plus 2 git pushes (empty branch, then cad612f), which are not REST. Zero label writes. Local-only writes to the dev server: 6 accounts via /api/v1/auth/admin/create-user, 5 sys_user_position rows, 1 sys_user_permission_set row, 6 change-password calls.", "deviations": [ "PR title is the issue title's stem plus a scope suffix ('— items 1 and 6: …'), not the full issue title AGENTS.md asks for, because the PR is Part of #99 and covers two of seven items.", "Item 6 is wider than the card's wording: the same reorder also moves finance, records and clm_admin to their own group's first row (same defect, same cause, same file).", "Item 1 is delivered only for the dashboards in the sidebar. The switcher half needs a platform capability (P1), reported and not worked around, per the lane ruling.", "Screenshots are not published. They are outside the src/apps + src/views surface, and the write budget allows no evidence branch. They stay in the scratchpad for the seat.", "Commit trailer is model-free (Co-Authored-By: Claude) and the PR footer uses the session-URL form, per the os-dev standing rules, not the harness reminder's model-named / emoji forms.", "Persona setup used an Executive 1 account beyond the README's five named personas, to measure a leadership rung. Forced first-sign-in password changes were cleared through POST /api/v1/auth/change-password. All of this was on the local dev server only." ], "open_questions": [ { "question": "Who reads Executive Overview? clm_executive / clm_general_manager hold only clm_requester, so no requiredPermissions spelling serves it to leadership and not to requesters.", "options": [ "A keep it served to every CLM user, row-scoped (today's behaviour, kept in this PR)", "B a leadership capability, e.g. a set bound to clm_executive + clm_general_manager (§04 change, maintainer)", "C client-side visible CEL on positions (still served; ties nav to position names)" ], "recommendation": "A now; B if the maintainer wants a leadership desk, which would also answer the next question" }, { "question": "Where should the two leadership rungs land? Executive 1 opens on an empty My Contracts. Their work arrives through Waiting on Me, a component row that findFirstRoute skips, and §05 gives them no group.", "options": [ "A accept the empty 我发起的", "B a leadership partition in §05 (DESIGN change, maintainer)" ], "recommendation": "decide together with the Executive Overview question; A until then" }, { "question": "CLM Admin 1 is no longer served Legal Workbench and Finance Overview (before: all three), because a row cannot be gated on 'legal OR admin' (P2).", "options": [ "A accept: the admin's §05 partition is configuration, and the boards belong to their audiences", "B wait for a platform any-of form", "C client-side visible CEL OR (served anyway)" ], "recommendation": "A" } ], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "PLATFORM P1 · class: a · reach: public door — as Business Requester 1 the console view switcher on /_console/apps/clm/clm_contract/view/my_contracts lists Awaiting Intake · My Reviews · 7 more (every legal/finance/records view); GET /api/v1/meta/view returns all 11 clm_contract views; /_console/apps/clm/dashboard/legal_workbench renders although its nav row is not served · evidence: ListViewSchema has no audience key (only sharing{type,lockedBy}); DashboardSchema has no requiredPermissions/visible; objectui ViewTabBar is fed by listViews() unfiltered · expected capability: a server-enforced audience gate on a list view and a dashboard · version: @objectstack/spec + console + rest 17.7.0 · no data exposure (row-scoped) · per lane ruling: reported, not filed, no workaround · dedupe words: view switcher audience gate, listViews requiredPermissions, ViewTabBar permission filter, dashboard requiredPermissions", "PLATFORM P2 · class: a · reach: public door — GET /api/v1/meta/app/clm as CLM Admin 1 serves only Executive Overview once single-capability row gates exist; filterAppForUserWithReason checks req.every, with no any-of form at any level · version 17.7.0 · per lane ruling: reported, not filed · dedupe words: requiredPermissions anyOf, requiredPermissions OR, navigation any-of permission" ] }Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 10, 2026
ACCEPT — PR #104, head
cad612f· items 1 and 6 (Part of #99) · 2026-10-10T05:06ZReviewed by the
repo:hotclmseat against GitHub.Validatecheck-runssuccessoncad612f= PRhead.shasrc/apps/clm.app.ts(+111/−72); nothing governed, none of the held filesPart of #99— items 2–5 and 7 stay on the cardclm_adminhad the same defect and the same reorder fixes them; a requester's served tree is unchangedclm_legal.access/clm_finance.access; the view-switcher half needs a platform capability — reported, not worked aroundOpen questions — the seat's answers (keeping today's behaviour; a change would be a
DESIGN.md§04 / §05 decision):clm_requester, so no gate can single them out today.Landing: waits on the maintainer's merge approval.
Out-of-scope findings
requiredPermissionshas no any-of form → filed spec (17.7.0): a list view or dashboard cannot be limited to an audience, andrequiredPermissionshas no any-of form — an app cannot show each audience only its own views and boards objectstack#22611Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 25, 2026
Landed — PR #104 · 2026-10-25T02:32Z
MERGED, squash449667eonmain, merged at its ACCEPT headorigin/main449667eRelease: items 1 and 6 are delivered (
Part of #99). Items 2–5 stay on this card and are now unblocked (PRs #91 and #101 are merged); item 2 also depends on objectstack-ai/objectstack#22590 (see #98). Item 7 is decision-shaped. The card goes back topm:queuewith no assignee.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 25, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 9
Session:
session_017nzWFRUo2U7evMkPdVniAnAccount:
zhuangjianguo(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/issue-99-orphan-draft-and-demo-noteWorktree:
hotclm-issue-99Domain:
repo:hotclm(single-lane sister repo — nodomain:*)Seat:
repo:hotclm#1File surface:
src/flows/contract-intake.flow.ts(item 4) ·scripts/demo.mjs(item 5) — stop on breach; explain in the reportContainer & model:
M,mode:subagent,model: opus(TIER_DEFAULT; hand-derived for a sister repo),effort: highClause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility:
item 4: this app's intake flow (it creates the draft on step 3, before the user commits) or the flow engine's abandon semantics — the dev establishes which | none known | every requester who closes the wizard after step 3·item 5: this app's scripts/demo.mjs | none | every operator who re-runs pnpm demoThread-read: 6392501019
Premise: holds for item 5 (
scripts/demo.mjs:412still prints "The seeded rows have no people on them yet" unconditionally onorigin/main449667e); item 4 is re-measured by the devSerial constraints cleared: PR #91 (held
contract-intake.flow.ts) merged9798471; PR #101 (heldscripts/demo.mjs) merged8d5072c. In flight: #94 onsrc/actions/contract-lifecycle.actions.tsonly — disjoint. Scope of this dispatch: items 4 and 5 only (Part of #99); item 2 waits on the platform release carrying objectstack-ai/objectstack#22590 (closed 2026-10-18, not in any 17.x release), item 3 is serial after #94 (same file), item 7 is decision-shaped.Generated by Claude Code
24 remaining items
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 17
Ruling-ref: 6398273819 (items 3 and 4; item 7 rides #43's PR)
Session:
session_017nzWFRUo2U7evMkPdVniAnAccount:
zhuangjianguo(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/issue-99-launch-wizardWorktree:
hotclm-issue-99Domain:
repo:hotclm(single-lane sister repo — nodomain:*)Seat:
repo:hotclm#1File surface:
src/flows/contract-intake.flow.ts(F1 launch wizard) ·src/actions/contract-lifecycle.actions.ts(start_renewalnavigation only) ·src/actions/contract.actions.ts(the launch action, only if the wizard's inputs change) · flow and action translations; stop on breach; explain in the reportContainer & model:
S,mode:subagent,model: opus(TIER_DEFAULT; hand-derived for a sister repo),effort: mediumClause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility:
this app's launch wizard and renewal hand-off (what a requester is asked, and where they land) | objectstack-ai/objectstack#25800 and #25801 shipped in 18.2.0 | every requester who launches or renews a contractThread-read: 6437376777
Premise: re-measured by the dev on
origin/main475106f(@objectstack 18.2.0) with the declared demo staffSerial constraints cleared: #156 landed (PR #170, flows) and #169 landed (PR #173, lifecycle actions). In flight: #43 (executed-upload, backfill action), #160 (notify nodes in other flows), #41 (data); all on disjoint files. Bundle: this dev also carries #161 and #162 on the same file, with one PR.
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Claim amendment (seat, 2026-10-27): the file surface gains one line,
{ name: 'renewal', type: 'object', isOutput: true }inRenewalStartFlow.variables(src/flows/renewal-notice.flow.ts).onSuccessnavigation (objectstack#25800) reads onlyisOutputvariables. #160 holds only that file's notify nodes, so the hunks stay disjoint.Generated by Claude Code
feat(security): gate F16 backfill on a backfill_contract capability
Records, legal and admin can backfill an executed contract (#177)
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Ruling-ref: 6398273819 (letter A)
Item 7 landed — PR #177 · 2026-10-27
The F16 backfill dialog now asks for the business owner (
owner_id, required, written as given). Measured: records@ picked Business Requester 2, and BR2 sees the contract under 我的合同 → 我发起的. Items 3–4 stay with the launch-wizard PR (with #161 and #162).Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 99, "bundle": "#99 items 3 and 4, #161, #162 (one PR)", "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-99-launch-wizard", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/hotclm/pull/180", "session": "session_017nzWFRUo2U7evMkPdVniAn", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Item 3: start_renewal declares onSuccess navigate '/apps/clm/clm_contract/record/${result.output.renewal.id}' (objectstack#25800, 18.2.0), and RenewalStartFlow gains the isOutput variable 'renewal'. That variable is the one seat-approved line outside the original surface, in src/flows/renewal-notice.flow.ts. Item 4: F1 now asks everything before its first write. The first version is a type 'file' field on screen_document (objectstack#25801); screen_upload is removed; create_party, create_contract, the version and the submit run after the last screen. An abandoned wizard leaves no draft and no counterparty. #161: parent_contract is a type 'lookup' screen field with reference clm_contract, and the stale header comments are rewritten. #162 (1) is absorbed by the reorder: on a type with no template the version step always asks for the file (required), so it is never empty. #162 (2): submit_now is a required select 提交方式 with no default; its options are true/false, so the variable stays boolean and the headless param is unchanged.", "zone2_measured": [ "objectstack#25801's second half is not built in 18.2.0: closing the dialog sends no cancel, and the run stays 'paused' (GET /api/v1/automation/contract_intake/runs). With write-at-end it holds nothing; a file uploaded before the close stays as an unowned sys_file (ref_object null).", "${result.output.X} reads only the flow's isOutput variables (dc71845 body, confirmed: the response carried output.renewal.id once declared; before, output {}).", "The console select binds the option's own value (ScreenView 18.2.0), so a boolean-valued select keeps submit_now a boolean, and the action door's submit_now param still works." ], "rulings_applied": "Ruling 6398273819 item 3 letter B (navigation half, now unblocked) and item 4 letter B (F1 reorder plus screen_upload removal, now unblocked). Seat amendment: one variable line in RenewalStartFlow.variables, recorded in the PR body. contract.actions.ts untouched (the inputs did not change).", "files_changed": ["src/flows/contract-intake.flow.ts", "src/actions/contract-lifecycle.actions.ts (start_renewal only)", "src/flows/renewal-notice.flow.ts (one seat-approved line)", "src/translations/en/flows.ts", "src/translations/zh-CN/flows.ts"], "tests": "No suite beyond the gates. Browser: pnpm demo:zh -- --port 3154 on a fresh DB per boot, Playwright at /opt/pw-browsers/chromium in zh-CN (plus one en-US run), declared demo staff with admin123, set-user-manager 200 x3. Every boot showed 'Plugins: 44 loaded' with no degraded and no no-such-table. BEFORE (475106f), requester1: NDA closed at 上传首个版本 took drafts 10 to 11 (NDA-2026-0021, version_count 0); 首个版本 had only a title, a sentence and 提交; 提交合同 was a lone checkbox 立即提交 and unticked kept a draft; 发起续签 answered 200 output {} and stayed on the source; a headless launch with no file paused at screen_upload with a draft written (13 to 14). As counsel1, SOW 主合同（记录 ID） was INPUT type=text. AFTER (full set on 9c4779d; abandon, draft, renewal and HTTP probes re-run on bdabe1e with the same results): NDA filled through every screen including the upload, then closed at the last screen, read contracts=120 drafts=10 parties=40 before and after, with the run paused. The new-counterparty path closed at the last screen kept parties at 41 and 41. 提交 with no 提交方式 chosen toasted '请填写以下必填字段：提交方式' and sent no resume. 先保存为草稿 gives a draft with v1; 现在提交给法务 / 审批 gives in_review. The en copy reads 'Submission' with 'Submit to legal / approval now' and 'Save as a draft for now'. #161 as counsel1 on SOW: the picker opened (BUTTON, popover with title, number and counterparty), and the pick SUP-2026-0007 landed in parent_contract on SOW-2026-0026. As requester1 on AMD, SOW-2026-0016 landed in parent_contract on AMD-2026-0005. Item 3 as requester1: 发起续签 on SOW-2026-0010 navigated to /record/zVlHPstXPKc_eJUo = SOW-2026-0025 (draft, renewed_from = source); press 2 was refused with the existing sentence and stayed on the source. Template path (template_file set on 订单 on the local DB only): the toggle shows, ticking hides the upload, and v1 is 'Drafted from the contract type template.' order-form-template.pdf, interactive and headless. Action door: blocked, missing and unknown-type launches are refused with counts unchanged. A headless launch with no file pauses at screen_document (first_version_file:file*) with counts unchanged; resuming with a URL gives 400 INVALID_SCREEN_INPUT and writes nothing; resuming with the id completes and the file is claimed (ref_object clm_contract_version). Headless with a file and headless with inline party + parent + submit both complete. 发起部门 and entity were stored. Browser console: the same 404/401 before sign-in and the pre-existing 'No such key: status' header warnings; nothing new. Server logs: no ERROR in any boot; the only WARN is the deliberate refused URL resume. Evidence: /tmp/claude-0/-home-claude/bc53be1b-6c43-5271-bc20-52035f64763b/scratchpad/issue-99/ (shots/*.png, wiz-*.out, renew-*.out, http-*.out, headless2-*.out, demo-*.log, g3-*.log). No ablation: metadata only, no tested behaviour.", "gates": "On bdabe1e (= PR head), each exit code captured before any pipe: pnpm install 0; pnpm validate 0 ('✓ Validation passed'); pnpm lint 0 ('6 suggestion(s)', 0 warnings, same as main); pnpm typecheck 0; pnpm lint:i18n-gate 0 ('COVERAGE : 0 missing keys across 2 locale(s)'); CLM_DEMO_SEED=1 pnpm validate 0. CI on bdabe1e at report time: Validate (push) completed success; Validate (pull_request) in_progress.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "0 — reads went through gh api", "api_writes": "2 relay writes as objectstack-fleet[bot]: (1) pr_create POST /repos/objectstack-ai/hotclm/pulls (#180; 8722 bytes sent = stored) plus assignee zhuangjianguo, read back; (2) this report via post-stamped, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/hotclm/issues/99/comments. 1 git push (not REST). Local dev-server writes only: set-user-manager x3 per boot, a template_file on 订单, probe contracts, versions, parties and uploads.", "deviations": [ "The surface was widened by one seat-approved line (RenewalStartFlow.variables in renewal-notice.flow.ts), recorded in the PR body.", "On one restart the old server was still exiting, and os dev auto-shifted the new boot to port 3155 (#175's port) for about two minutes. I stopped it by process group before using it and rebooted on 3154. Nothing was measured on 3155.", "The relay opened PR #180 as draft:true, although the actions file carried no draft key.", "The common.md file changed on disk mid-run (lint baseline now '0 warnings, 6 suggestions'); I followed the new text." ], "item_99_state": "Items 3 and 4 are fully done in this PR. Every other #99 item is landed (1, 2, 5, 6) except item 7, which rides #43's PR. Once #43's PR lands, nothing is left on #99 and the seat can close it.", "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "noted, not filed (platform, objectstack#25801 second half): closing a screen-flow dialog leaves the run paused and an uploaded file unowned (sys_file ref_object null). This is upstream's open product decision. carrier: objectstack-ai/objectstack#25801", "noted, not filed (pre-existing copy): a renewal draft's title begins with 'Renewal —' in English under zh-CN (clm_renewal_draft). carrier: none (joins the #95 text remainder if the seat wants it)", "noted, not filed (drift): the src/actions/contract.actions.ts header still says flat screens have no record picker. Left alone because the inputs did not change. carrier: none, PR Acceptance notes", "noted, not filed: headless refusal sentences answer in English when the caller sends no locale (pre-existing, unchanged). carrier: none" ] }The launch wizard asks everything before it writes (#180)
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 27, 2026
Ruling-ref: 6398273819 (letter A)
Landed — PR #180 · 2026-10-27
MERGED(squash onmain), merged at its ACCEPT headbdabe1e; this card closes with itRelease: the launch wizard asks every question before it writes anything, so a wizard closed part-way leaves no draft and no counterparty; 发起续签 opens the renewal it created. Items 1, 2, 5 and 6 landed earlier and item 7 in PR #177, so every item of this card is done and the card is closed. State:
pm:dispatchedremoved, assignee cleared.Generated by Claude Code