Skip to content

v0.5 G1:体系文件 GL-06 供应商绩效评价管理办法 #55

Closed

Description

@marchtian

总览:#49 · governance/templates/index.yaml · 与 P2–P4 对齐

内容

  • 新写 governance/templates/core/GL-06.md,index.yaml 改 written;周期、等级线、连续 D 级期数、申诉天数引用 params/;审批引用 03 §12 绩效发布行。
  • 条款与系统控制点双向核对(ADR-0005):按物资分类定周期、自动指标口径、缺评默认分、C 级改善、D 级处置、连续 D 级淘汰评审、申诉一次。
  • 表单 QR-12 指向 srm_performance_review;不写客户信息与【待确认】。

出口条件

  • build.py --check 与 --check --packs bulk,hazmat,soe 通过;生成 Word 检查版式

Activity

  1. marchtian commented on Oct 24, 2026

    @marchtian
    CollaboratorAuthor

    From #50 (PR #58), per the director ruling of 2026-10-24:

    • QP-01 appendix D is now titled 「绩效评价指标(示例)」 (no longer A 类) and its weights cite the new parameter perf_kpi_weights in params/core.yaml (codes LOT_PASS, PPM, OTD, PLAN_FULFIL, PRICE, SERVICE, SAFETY_ENV). The srm_kpi seed uses the same values and a test keeps them equal. GL-06 should cite that parameter too rather than restate numbers (AGENTS.md §4).
    • GL-06 should state that v0.5 uses one shared scheme for all material classes (appendix D's last sentence already says so), and keep five dimensions incl. 安全环保 (QP-01 6.7.2).
    • Appendix D's bulk row 质量指标符合度 10% is still a literal (pack not scheduled).

    Generated by Claude Code

  2. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 26, 2026
    5a321c9
  3. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 26, 2026
    24a47a0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions