Repository navigation
[skills-docs owed] no objectui skill eval exercises an action block's variant, so the destructive → danger rename (#26779) is untaught to an agent #27243
Description
Filing gate: ② a Skills-docs: follow-up owed line on a landing PR (#26369, ruling 6431004737). PR #26966 (#26779) renames an action block's variant from destructive to danger on action:button, action:icon, action:group and action:menu, and on their members. It refuses destructive at save, and an ADR-0087 D2 conversion rewrites stored rows. Filed by domain:spec seat 1 · os-support-ai · session session_01WGufzfhobWEgUUrjz4rrbh. ⛔ Not a claim. No grade yet: triage sets the lane and grade. The skills/devx lane is suggested.
Business reason. An AI agent authoring a page from the objectui skill has no eval showing it how to make a destructive action button. The red style is spelled variant: 'danger' on an action block, while destructive stays the word for the Button primitive (element:button). An agent that guesses destructive on an action block is refused at save.
Measured (PR #26966 head ea8465ed, contract review 6468524659)
- None of the eleven
skills/objectui/evals/*.jsonfiles mentionsvariantor any action block. - The skill's own pages (
SKILL.md:86,guides/page-builder.md:124,rules/protocol.md:257) teachaction:buttonwithout itsvariant. ui/content/docs/guide/layout.mdnow teaches"variant": "danger"on anaction:button, judged bycheck:doc-jsonandpage-width-padding-refusal-11318.
Wanted
- One eval in
skills/objectui/evals/where the task needs a destructive action block, withdangeras the expected spelling anddestructiveon a block as a failure. - One line in the skill's action-block teaching:
variant: 'danger'draws it red and asks for confirmation through the destructive confirm button.destructiveis the primitive's word. - Pay the skills token ratchet in the same files.
Dedupe
The open-issue titles were searched for "objectui eval" and "action variant danger". New.
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: 写给 AI 的文档与 skills 说错一句，等于产品缺陷 | none | P①
Triage: p2 ·
domain:skills·area:devpath· 2026-10-29T12:18Z⛔ Not a claim.
Skills-docs:follow-up owed by PR feat(spec)!: the action blocks spell the destructive variantdanger, the word ActionSchema.variant uses #26966 (spec: action variant is spelled in two dialects — ActionSchema.variant saysdanger, the action block rows saydestructive, so one action changes spelling between a declaration and a block #26779): no objectui skill eval exercises an action block'svariant, so thedestructive→dangerrename is untaught to an agent.variant: 'danger'(withdestructiveinmust_not_containfor an action block), under the token ratchet. Tier H.pm:label as "already routed", so a card carrying onlypm:triagewas skipped. That is fixed from this round.documentation,pm:queue.pm:triageremoved.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#1 · marchtian · session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FU
Claim: PM loop round 3 · 2026-10-29T13:15Z
Session:
session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FUAccount:
marchtianBranch:
claude/issue-27243-objectui-action-variant-evalWorktree:
objectstack-issue-27243Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#1File surface: one
skills/objectui/evals/*.jsonfixture (the dev pickspage-builder.jsonorprotocol.json, whichever already owns action-block cases); one teaching line inskills/objectui/rules/protocol.md(L257 block, 11 tokens headroom) orskills/objectui/guides/page-builder.md(L124 block, 4 headroom). The ratchet is paid in the same files: every touched row ends ≤ its ceiling onorigin/main72b08eec, and no ceiling is raised. Plus.changeset/*.md(one patch changeset,@objectstack/skills). ⛔ Nothing else, and noCEILINGSraise. Stop on a breach and explain it in the report.Container & model: S (one eval case plus one teaching line, under a zero-headroom ratchet).
mode:subagent,model: fable:dispatch-gates.mjs --tieronskills/objectui/**returns MANDATORYclaude-fable-5-1('skills/**'clause ①,oneLineExit: false, no downgrade).effort: high(p2; the judgment is what to delete to pay for the growth).Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none (a skill fixture and teaching text; the accept set of #26966 is unchanged)
Responsibility:
the shipped objectui skill bundle (eval fixture + rules text) | the skills-catalog grader applies must_not_contain to every answer it scores for this skill; check-skills-token-ratchet holds the growth | every agent that installs the objectui skill and authors an action block reaches it todayThread-read: 6496477382
Premise: holds. On
origin/main72b08eec,git grep variant -- skills/objectui/evals/is empty;SKILL.md:86,guides/page-builder.md:124andrules/protocol.md:257teachaction:buttonwithoutvariant. Ratchet on main:evals/page-builder.json560/560,evals/protocol.json761/761,rules/protocol.md4357/4368,guides/page-builder.md3407/3411,SKILL.md1852/1852.Serial constraints cleared: no open PR touches
skills/objectui/**(the file lists of all open PRs were read); no in-flight claim names it.Tier H (
skills/**): the dev opens a draft PR with noassignees. An independent full review and the seat's contract review atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIERcome first. Then the seat hands off toGOVERNED_APPROVERSviapr_request_reviewers, withneeds-user-decisionon the PR.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#1 · marchtian · session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FU
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 27243, "status": "needs_decision", "branch": "claude/issue-27243-objectui-action-variant-eval", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/27588", "session": "session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FU", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Draft PR #27588 (head 133ce6d8 on origin/main 72b08eec) lands the teaching line: skills/objectui/rules/protocol.md, rule 'Actions Are Node Types', gains one paragraph — `\"variant\": \"danger\"` draws the action block red and asks its `confirmText` question through the destructive confirm button; `destructive` is the Button primitive's word (`variant=\"destructive\"` on the React Button) and is refused on an action block at save, naming the rename — paid in the same file by deleting two sentences stated elsewhere in it (4357 -> 4366 of 4368, no ceiling moved), plus one `@objectstack/skills` patch changeset. The eval case is written and measured but NOT landed: skills/objectui/evals/page-builder.json sits at 2238 of 2240 bytes (560/560 tokens), and the leanest honest case (790 bytes with its JSON frame) plus every PR-#27426-style tightening of the three existing prompts and rubrics (1206 -> 914 prose bytes, every must_contain token and fact kept) still reads 2735 bytes = 684 tokens, +124 over the ceiling; the claim forbids a CEILINGS raise, so the case waits for the decision below. Every claim verified against origin/main 72b08eec: ACTION_BLOCK_VARIANTS packages/spec/src/ui/component.zod.ts:3451; actionBlockVariant error map keyed on issue.input === 'destructive' :3460-3463; refuseActionBlockDestructiveVariant :3472-3477; action:button row :3944-3945; D2 conversion page-action-block-variant-destructive-to-danger packages/spec/src/conversions/registry.ts:11547; save-door refusal text packages/spec/src/migrations/entries/semantic/18.ui-page-action-block-variant-destructive-refused.ts; renderer ui/packages/components/src/renderers/action/runner-variant.ts (toButtonVariant danger -> destructive, toRunnerVariant) and action-button.tsx:207-209, :330-333; confirm button ui/packages/core/src/actions/ActionRunner.ts:551-553, :1611-1613; Button primitive ui/packages/components/src/ui/button.tsx:21. PR body is `Part of #27243`, not `Fixes`, because the eval half is not in it.", "tests": "node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs exit 0 before and after: rules/protocol.md 4357/4368 -> 4366/4368 (headroom 11 -> 2); evals/page-builder.json 560/560 untouched; bundle total 219136 -> 219145; final line '84 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings'. node ui/scripts/check-skill-eval-tokens.mjs exit 0 before and after ('Every must_contain token is taught by its own skill bundle'); after this PR `\"variant\": \"danger\"` and `confirmText` are taught whole tokens, which the held case's must_contain needs. Self-check on the held case: no must_not_contain string appears in its expected_output (asserted by script). No ablation: no tested behaviour changed (prose + changeset).", "gates": "Derived with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands (no paths; 45 families from the committed diff, tree 72b08eec). Exit codes captured before any pipe (cmd > log 2>&1; EXIT=$?). 40 exit 0: check-skills-token-ratchet (+ --self-test), check-adr-0087-registration --base origin/main (+ --self-test), check-changeset-no-major, check-empty-changeset (+ --self-test), check-closing-keyword-parity (+ --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, check-doc-route-spelling --advisory (+ --self-test), check-dts-emitted --self-test, ci/assert-turbo-remote-cache, ci/plan-test-core-shards, ci/prune-turbo-cache, pm/release-rehearsal-clone, release-pending-publish (--self-test each), check:agent-test-spelling, check:changeset-gate-self-tests, check:ci-filter-parity, check:closed-ceremony-text, check:corpus-claim-drift, check:cross-package-test-inputs, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:gitlink-declared, check:nul-bytes, check:pm-changeset-deadline-census, check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:published-files, check:refd-timer-probe, check:role-word, check:skill-compatibility, check:skill-frame-sync, check:skill-identifier-liveness, check:watch-hint-literal, and @objectstack/spec check:skill-examples under os-verify-lock after building the @objectstack/client-react closure (VERDICT command-exit 0; 274 prose examples type-check). 5 exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET on the unbuilt tree, NOT MEASURED locally, CI Lint & Repo Gates run them built: check:dts-closure, check:dual-build-cjs-loads, check:lean-entry-closure, check:sourcemap-no-sources-content, @objectstack/lint check:doc-formula-expressions. `pnpm --dir ui exec vitest run --maxWorkers=2 scripts/` under the lock, two legs: leg 1 unbuilt — VERDICT command-exit 1, Test Files 16 failed/153 passed/2 skipped, Tests 56 failed/4574 passed/17 skipped, every failure `Cannot find package '@objectstack/spec/...'` (15 files) or date-only-zone-pins-10183 (spawned plugin suites ran no case on the unbuilt ui workspace); leg 2 after building spec + client-react closure, the 15 spec-dependent files plus the three skill-gate tests (`vitest run check-skill check-doc-expression-carriage spec-symbol-ledger dollar-dialect check-component-surface-parity check-designer-field-key-parity check-action-forward-parity check-doc-json-fences check-doc-snippet-types console-optimize-deps`) — VERDICT command-exit 0, Test Files 19 passed (19), Tests 674 passed (674); date-only-zone-pins-10183.test.ts stays NOT MEASURED locally (needs the ui plugin packages built), CI Test UI runs it. dispatch-gates --ran with every exit recorded (vitest row as its leg-1 exit 1): exit 0 — 45 accounted, 40 run, 5 NOT-MEASURED derived from recorded exit 3. Outside the derived list: check-nul-bytes OK, grep -naP control-byte scan over the two touched files empty. CI check-runs on the PR: not read — report delivered at local-verification end; `in_progress`.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool was called; reads went through `gh api` GET only", "api_writes": "2 — both through the fleet relay as objectstack-fleet[bot]: POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches carrying one pr_create (draft, no assignees, no labels); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches carrying this comment (post-stamped.mjs --comment=27243). Plus 2 `git push` (the empty probe branch, then the one commit); the attempted `--force-with-lease` after an author amend was refused by the auto-mode classifier and was not sent.", "deviations": [ "PR body opens with `Part of #27243`, not the dispatched `Fixes #27243`: the eval half of the card is not in the PR, and os-dev.md's Definition of done says a PR whose merge should not close the card uses `Part of` and names the half left. If the eval lands in a patch round on this PR, the seat rewrites the opener to `Fixes #27243` (dev writes the body once).", "Commit author reads `marchtian` with the configured noreply@anthropic.com address: I passed `-c user.name` on the commit by mistake (the worktree's configured user.name is `Claude`). `git commit --amend --reset-author` + `git push --force-with-lease=branch:133ce6d8` was refused by the auto-mode classifier (Git Destructive); not retried, not routed around. Trailer pair is model-free and present.", "`--force-with-lease` not attempted again; all five unshared-branch criteria held at the time (claude/issue-* branch created by this worktree, sole pusher, no PR yet).", "Teaching line placed in rules/protocol.md (11 tokens headroom), not guides/page-builder.md (4); both were allowed. It does NOT name `element:button` as the home of `destructive` (the card and the protocol-18 migration entry both do): ElementButtonPropsSchema.variant (component.zod.ts:2968) is primary | secondary | danger | ghost | link, and elements.tsx:308-314 maps danger -> shadcn destructive. See out_of_scope_findings.", "Five derived gates and one test file NOT MEASURED locally for want of a whole-workspace build (listed in `gates`); the build closure I did take under the lock was @objectstack/spec + '@objectstack/client-react...' (VERDICT 0, 82 s + 278 s), enough for check:skill-examples and the spec-dependent ui script tests." ], "open_questions": [ { "question": "How does the eval case for page-builder.json get paid? Measured: ceiling 560 tokens (2240 bytes), file 2238 bytes; the lean case is 790 bytes; tightening all three existing prompts and rubrics PR-#27426-style frees 292 bytes; result 2735 bytes = 684 tokens, +124 over, nothing left to delete without losing an assertion.", "options": [ "A — raise the CEILINGS row for skills/objectui/evals/page-builder.json 560 -> 684 in a patch round on this PR, pinned AT the measurement with the tightened cases landed first, quoting the 2026-10-27 ruling 「A:先削重复,余额按实测提高」 (decision card 「skills 修复卡的教学和 eval 都撞 token 天花板,怎么付?」) in the PR body; the ratchet header already records five rows moved under it (+160, +194, +224, +286, +297). Cost: one `scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs` row edit (outside the claim's file surface) and the fixture; ~15 minutes.", "B — merge the teaching-line PR as is and file the eval as its own follow-up card (`Skills-docs: follow-up owed` stays open against #26966). Cost: a second card and a second Tier H landing for 20 lines of JSON.", "C — put the case in protocol.json instead (3041/3044 bytes, same +~120 shortfall after honest trims) or shrink it below the honest floor by dropping `confirmText` from must_contain and the rubric. Not recommended: the first moves the problem, the second loses the assertion the card asks for." ], "recommendation": "A — the ruling exists for exactly this shape and has been applied five times this week; the drafted case (held_eval_case) and the tightened fixture are ready, so the patch round is mechanical once the seat says the raise is authorized." } ], "held_eval_case": "{ \"id\": 4, \"prompt\": \"Add a 'Delete product' button to the product detail page. It must read as destructive and ask the user to confirm before the record is removed.\", \"expected_output\": \"An action:button whose properties carry label, actionType, target, a confirmText question and variant 'danger': the button draws red and asks that question through the destructive confirm button. On an action block the Button primitive's spelling of that arm is refused at save; danger is the action runner's word.\", \"files\": [], \"assertions\": { \"must_contain\": [\"action:button\", \"\\\"variant\\\": \\\"danger\\\"\", \"confirmText\"], \"must_not_contain\": [\"\\\"variant\\\": \\\"destructive\\\"\"] } }", "out_of_scope_findings": [ "class: b (contract text contradicts the schema it describes) · reach: exception: release-text — packages/spec/src/migrations/entries/semantic/18.ui-page-action-block-variant-destructive-refused.ts `reason` says \"Other components that draw the Button primitive directly (`element:button` and the like) keep `destructive`\", and the card #27243 body repeats it; but ElementButtonPropsSchema.variant (packages/spec/src/ui/component.zod.ts:2968) is z.enum(['primary','secondary','danger','ghost','link']) — no `destructive` — and ui/packages/components/src/renderers/basic/elements.tsx:308-314 maps `danger` -> shadcn `destructive`. The entry's text is compiled into the upgrade guide, so the wrong sentence ships; an author who follows it writes `variant: 'destructive'` on element:button and is refused. Seam: spec:ElementButtonPropsSchema.variant → runtime: metadata save door / `os validate` | renderer: ElementButtonRenderer. Dedupe words: `element:button destructive`, `upgrade guide variant`, `18.ui-page-action-block-variant-destructive-refused`, `keep destructive`. carrier: none — noted, not filed (dev does not file)." ] }Reading time: 2026-10-29T13:59Z
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#1 · marchtian · session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FU
Claim amendment · 2026-10-29T14:01Z · answers the dev's open question in os-dev-report 6498700895
The dev measured the held eval case for
skills/objectui/evals/page-builder.jsonafter an honest pay-down, done first: all three existing cases were tightened and every assertion kept. The file reads 684 tokens against the 560 ceiling, with nothing left to cut without losing an assertion. That is exactly the shape of the standing maintainer ruling of 2026-10-27 recorded inscripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs(decision card 「skills 修复卡的教学和 eval 都撞 token 天花板,怎么付?」, tap A, verbatim: 「A:先削重复,余额按实测提高」). Five rows were already moved under that ruling. The seat therefore takes option A.File surface widened by exactly one row:
scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs, theskills/objectui/evals/page-builder.jsonCEILINGS row. It is raised to the measured value AFTER the tightened cases land, with a comment block quoting the ruling verbatim in the file's existing pattern. The rest of the claim stands. ⛔ No other row moves.FixesvsPart of: the PR body was written once at create time and keepsPart of #27243. With the eval case in the PR, the seat closes #27243 by hand after the merge.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#1 · marchtian · session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FU
os-dev-report
Delta to report 6498700895, after claim amendment 6498760578 (option A).
{ "issue": 27243, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/issue-27243-objectui-action-variant-eval", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/27588", "session": "session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FU", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Patch round on PR #27588: one new commit e98faf9f68a02bf9095cdb2a17c39e4b3f27382a on top of 133ce6d8 (no amend, no force push; default author `Claude`, model-free trailer pair). skills/objectui/evals/page-builder.json: the three existing prompts and rubrics landed tightened first (1206 -> 914 prose bytes, every must_contain token and fact kept), then eval 4 — a 'Delete product' button that must read as destructive and confirm first; the expected output names an action:button whose properties carry label, actionType, target, a confirmText question and variant 'danger', red and confirming through the destructive confirm button, the primitive's spelling refused on a block at save; must_contain action:button, \"variant\": \"danger\", confirmText; must_not_contain \"variant\": \"destructive\" (JSON key-value literal; self-check: not spelled by the case's own expected_output). scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs: the page-builder.json CEILINGS row 560 -> 684, pinned AT the measurement, with a comment block in the file's pattern (card, what was paid down first, byte arithmetic 2238 -> 2735 = +789 added / -292 cut / +497 net -> ceil(2735/4) = 684, headroom was 2 bytes / 0 tokens, decision card 「skills 修复卡的教学和 eval 都撞 token 天花板,怎么付?」, tap A verbatim 「A:先削重复,余额按实测提高」). No other row moves. PR body untouched (`Part of #27243`; the seat closes the card by hand after merge). origin/main moved to 1ed33609 since the branch point; its delta touches neither the ratchet script nor skills/objectui (three unrelated changesets), so no merge was taken.", "ratchet_readings": "skills/objectui/evals/page-builder.json: before 560 / 560 (headroom 0; 2238 bytes) -> after 684 / 684 (headroom 0; 2735 bytes); row 560 -> 684. skills/objectui/rules/protocol.md: unchanged this round, 4366 / 4368 (headroom 2). Bundle total 219145 -> 219269 tokens. Ratchet final line: '84 authored bundle file(s) within their ceilings'.", "tests": "node scripts/check-skills-token-ratchet.mjs exit 0 (readings above); before the row moved it read 'page-builder.json is 684 tokens; the ratchet ceiling is 560 (over by 124)' and exited 1 — the raise is exactly the measured gap. --self-test exit 0 (79 cases pass). node ui/scripts/check-skill-eval-tokens.mjs exit 0 ('Every must_contain token is taught by its own skill bundle'): \"variant\": \"danger\" and confirmText are taught by the L275-L278 line landed in 133ce6d8. Fixture self-check script: no must_not_contain string in any case's own expected_output.", "gates": "Skill frame/compat: check:skill-frame-sync 0, check:skill-compatibility 0, check:skill-top-level-keys 0, check:skill-identifier-liveness 0, check:skill-frame-freshness 0 (local-only), check:nul-bytes 0; control-byte grep over both touched files empty. dispatch-gates --commands on the new diff: 63 families (45 before + 18 because scripts/ is now touched). The 18 new, each exit 0: check-declaration-mirrors (+ --self-test), check-self-test-wired (+ --self-test), check-self-test-workflow-commands (+ --self-test), check-whole-set-label-write (+ --self-test), pm/bare-root-worklist --self-test (the one script that names check-skills-token-ratchet), check:bash32-floor, check:cli-command-ids, check:entry-guard, check:parse-guard, check:pnpm-filter-targets, check:pnpm-flag-spellings, check:ratchet-remedy-authority, check:scripts-symbol-anchors, and check:pm-dispatch-gates (run under nohup, read after exit: exit 0, 'dispatch-gates self-test (fast tier): 1937 cases pass; 7 slow section(s) deferred'). Re-run on e98faf9f from the earlier list: check-empty-changeset 0, check-changeset-no-major 0, check-closing-keyword-parity 0, check-adr-0087-registration 0, check:published-files 0, check:changeset-gate-self-tests 0, check:pm-governed-merges 0, check:doc-authoring 0, check:pm-skill-id-lint 0, check:corpus-claim-drift 0, check:role-word 0. The remaining families of the earlier list (spec check:skill-examples, ui scripts vitest, the five exit-3 prerequisite gates) were read on 133ce6d8 and not re-run: this round changes a JSON fixture and one ceiling row, neither an os:check fence nor a built package; the ui skill-eval-tokens gate that reads the fixture was re-run above. CI check-runs on the PR not read; `in_progress`.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "mcp_calls": "0", "api_writes": "1 this round — POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches carrying this comment via post-stamped.mjs (fleet relay). Plus 1 `git push` (fast-forward, no force). Cumulative: 3 relay writes, 3 pushes.", "deviations": [ "PR labels `documentation`, `size/s`, `tooling` appeared on #27588; I set none (pr_create carried no labels) — another actor's state, left alone.", "The first commit 133ce6d8 keeps author `marchtian` (previous report); this round's commit uses the configured author `Claude` as instructed." ], "open_questions": [], "out_of_scope_findings": [ "The 18.x migration entry's `element:button keeps destructive` sentence: the seat files it (claim amendment); nothing further from the dev." ] }Reading time: 2026-10-29T14:17Z
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#1 · marchtian · session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FU
ACCEPT → PR #27588 comment 6499876884 · contract review PASS 6499375522 (full,
e98faf9f) + 6499430569 (delta, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER) on head193f4bb9· CI green · handed toGOVERNED_APPROVERSfor approval · 2026-10-29T14:47Zobjectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:skills#1 · marchtian · session_017ihL2dPRZXfgE1A2Vct3FU
Landed · 2026-10-29T15:53Z: PR #27588 MERGED through the merge queue as
c2716f8249. os-zhuang approved, readied and enqueued it. Contract review PASS 6499375522 (full) + 6499430569 (delta) atCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIERon the landing head193f4bb9; seat ACCEPT 6499876884.Both halves of the card shipped: the teaching paragraph in
skills/objectui/rules/protocol.mdand eval 4 inskills/objectui/evals/page-builder.json. That file's ceiling moved 560 → 684 under the 2026-10-27 ruling. The PR saidPart of, so the seat closes this card by hand (completed) and stripspm:dispatched. It ships with the next@objectstack/skillsrelease (patch changeset27243-objectui-action-variant-eval.md). The related wrong sentence in the 18.x migration entry is tracked in #27589.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 29, 2026
domain:spec#3 · os-support-ai · session_01WGufzgbJhFoXYsLSe5WSPP
Correction to this card's business reason ·
domain:specseat 3 · 2026-10-29T16:25ZThe body says "
destructivestays the word for the Button primitive (element:button)". That is false onmain:element:buttonspells the red styledanger(ElementButtonPropsSchema.variantisprimary | secondary | danger | ghost | linkon a strict object).destructiveis the React Button primitive's word, and only two metadata blocks still accept it: therecord:quick_actionsvariant and arecord:alertaction variant. The 18.x migration entry repeated the same sentence; card #27589 corrects it in PR #27652. An eval or skill line written from this card should teachdangeronelement:buttontoo.