Skip to content

[release-5.0] USHIFT-7065: CI implementation: Support MicroShift V5.0 on RHEL 9.8 GA Implementation - #7297

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 5 commits into
openshift:release-5.0from
agullon:USHIFT-7065-release-5.0
Sep 3, 2026
Merged

[release-5.0] USHIFT-7065: CI implementation: Support MicroShift V5.0 on RHEL 9.8 GA Implementation#7297
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 5 commits into
openshift:release-5.0from
agullon:USHIFT-7065-release-5.0

Conversation

@agullon

@agullon agullon commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Backport of #7139 to release-5.0.

  • Add RHEL 9.8 y-1/y-2 image blueprints for upgrade scenarios
  • Add RPM upgrade scenario from 4.21 to 5.0 on RHEL 9.8
  • Add ostree upgrade scenarios from 4.21/4.22 to 5.0 on RHEL 9.8
  • Add bootc upgrade scenarios from 4.21/4.22 to 5.0 on RHEL 9.8
  • Rename RPM release scenarios to match naming convention

Test plan

  • CI passes on release-5.0 branch

Add ostree (.toml) and bootc (.containerfile) image blueprints for
RHEL 9.8 with y-1 (4.22) and y-2 (4.21) MicroShift versions.

These start images are prerequisites for the el98→el98 upgrade CI
scenarios added in subsequent commits.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
Test RPM-based upgrade from MicroShift 4.21 (y-2) to 5.0 on RHEL 9.8
using the YMINUS2 release repo and brew RPMs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
…on RHEL 9.8

Test ostree upgrades from MicroShift 4.22 (y-1) and 4.21 (y-2) to 5.0
on RHEL 9.8 with LVMS workload validation and standard1+standard2 suites.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
…n RHEL 9.8

Test bootc upgrades from MicroShift 4.22 (y-1) and 4.21 (y-2) to 5.0
on RHEL 9.8 with LVMS workload validation and standard1+standard2 suites.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
- el98@rpm-upgrade.sh → el98-yminus1@el98-lrel@rpm.sh
- el98@rpm-standard1.sh → el98-lrel@rpm-standard1.sh
- el98@rpm-standard2.sh → el98-lrel@rpm-standard2.sh
- el98-yminus2@rpm-upgrade.sh → el98-yminus2@el98-lrel@rpm.sh

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 1, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@agullon: This pull request references USHIFT-7065 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

Backport of #7139 to release-5.0.

  • Add RHEL 9.8 y-1/y-2 image blueprints for upgrade scenarios
  • Add RPM upgrade scenario from 4.21 to 5.0 on RHEL 9.8
  • Add ostree upgrade scenarios from 4.21/4.22 to 5.0 on RHEL 9.8
  • Add bootc upgrade scenarios from 4.21/4.22 to 5.0 on RHEL 9.8
  • Rename RPM release scenarios to match naming convention

Test plan

  • CI passes on release-5.0 branch

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: b6afd083-bb57-48e8-809f-05037c6bb89d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from ggiguash and pacevedom September 1, 2026 15:00
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 1, 2026
@agullon
agullon marked this pull request as draft September 1, 2026 15:05
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 1, 2026
@agullon
agullon marked this pull request as ready for review September 2, 2026 09:00
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 2, 2026
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from copejon and jogeo September 2, 2026 09:01
@agullon

agullon commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-cache
/test e2e-aws-tests-cache-arm

@agullon

agullon commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests-release
/test e2e-aws-tests-release-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el9
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el10
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el9
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el10

@agullon

agullon commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el10
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el10

because no changes in any el10 scenario in this PR

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agullon: Overrode contexts on behalf of agullon: ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el10, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el10

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el10
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el10

because no changes in any el10 scenario in this PR

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@agullon

agullon commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-release

because all scenarios changed in this PR are passing

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agullon: Overrode contexts on behalf of agullon: ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-release

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-release

because all scenarios changed in this PR are passing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@agullon

agullon commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-tests
/test e2e-aws-tests-arm
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm-el9
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-arm-el10
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-el9
/test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-el10

@agullon

agullon commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el9
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el9

because failures are because timeouts waiting for resources to starts that will be addressed in a following PRs:

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agullon: Overrode contexts on behalf of agullon: ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el9, ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el9

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el9
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el9

because failures are because timeouts waiting for resources to starts that will be addressed in a following PRs:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@agullon

agullon commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-el10

because this PR does not change any scenario in that CI job

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agullon: Overrode contexts on behalf of agullon: ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-el10

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-el10

because this PR does not change any scenario in that CI job

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@agullon: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el10 3072198 link true /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el10
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el9 3072198 link true /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el9
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el9 3072198 link true /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-arm-el9
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el10 3072198 link true /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-release-el10
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-release 3072198 link true /test e2e-aws-tests-release
ci/prow/e2e-aws-tests-bootc-el10 3072198 link true /test e2e-aws-tests-bootc-el10

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@agullon

agullon commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label jira/valid-bug
/label backport-risk-assessed
/verified by CI

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 3, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Sep 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@agullon: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/label jira/valid-bug
/label backport-risk-assessed
/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@pacevedom pacevedom left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 3, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: agullon, pacevedom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot
openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit e660c9e into openshift:release-5.0 Sep 3, 2026
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants