Skip to content

Add S2I speculative deploy testing for telemetry-operator - #992

Draft
danpawlik wants to merge 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
danpawlik:s2i-test
Draft

Add S2I speculative deploy testing for telemetry-operator#992
danpawlik wants to merge 1 commit into
openstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
danpawlik:s2i-test

Conversation

@danpawlik

@danpawlik danpawlik commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Implement similar S2I testing workflow as watcher-operator [1] that adds:

  • s2i-speculative-deploy-test-telemetry job - validates speculatively-built S2I telemetry-operator container images against a live OpenStack deployment with telemetry enabled
  • s2i-openstack-container-content-provider job - builds S2I containers
  • Non-voting github-check jobs to validate S2I builds before merging

This enables testing whether speculatively-rebuilt telemetry container images function correctly in real deployments.

Cloudkitty s2i (cloudkitty/cloudkitty-api) deferred: the cloudkitty deploy path pulls the meta content provider, which conflicts with s2i image injection. Add when a clean deploy path exists.

[1] openstack-k8s-operators/watcher-operator#443

Related-To: OSPRH-34558
Assisted-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 noreply@anthropic.com

Implement similar S2I testing workflow as watcher-operator [1]
that adds:

- s2i-speculative-deploy-test-telemetry job - validates speculatively-built
   S2I telemetry-operator container images against a live OpenStack deployment
   with telemetry enabled
- s2i-openstack-container-content-provider job - builds S2I containers
- Non-voting github-check jobs to validate S2I builds before merging

This enables testing whether speculatively-rebuilt telemetry container images
function correctly in real deployments.

Cloudkitty s2i (cloudkitty/cloudkitty-api) deferred: the cloudkitty deploy
path pulls the meta content provider, which conflicts with s2i image
injection. Add when a clean deploy path exists.

[1] openstack-k8s-operators/watcher-operator#443

Related-To: OSPRH-34558
Assisted-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Pawlik <dpawlik@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danpawlik
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign paramite for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

  • Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Comment thread zuul.d/projects.yaml
- name: openstack-k8s-operators/s2i-openstack-containers
override-checkout: main
vars:
cifmw_crc_additional_insecure_registries:

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add

cifmw_crc_additional_allowed_registries:
        - "{{ s2i_content_provider_registry_ip }}:5001"

@rebtoor

rebtoor commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@danpawlik hey Daniel until they get merged, you need depends-on to openstack-k8s-operators/s2i-openstack-containers#91 and openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#4131

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants