Agentic skill for feature demo

[evgeny-s]

Description

This PR introduces an agentic skill for the feature demo (technical/non-technical).

Related Issue(s)

• Closes #[issue number]

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Other (please describe):

Breaking Change

If this PR introduces a breaking change, please provide a detailed description of the impact and the migration path for existing applications.

Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have run ./scripts/fix_rust.sh to ensure my code is formatted and linted correctly
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Screenshots (if applicable)

Please include any relevant screenshots or GIFs that demonstrate the changes made.

Additional Notes

Please provide any additional information or context that may be helpful for reviewers.

[github-actions]

🛡️ AI Review — Skeptic (security review)

VERDICT: SAFE

BASELINE scrutiny: established account, repo write permission, substantial prior subtensor activity, no Gittensor allowlist hit; branch agent-skill-feature-demo -> devnet-ready.

Static Skeptic review found the patch limited to new markdown skill instructions under .agents/skills/feature-demo/ and .claude/skills/feature-demo/. It does not modify runtime or pallet code, workflows, trusted .github/ai-review/* files, .github/copilot-instructions.md, build scripts, Cargo manifests, or lockfiles.

Findings

No findings.

Conclusion

No malicious behavior or security vulnerability was found in the PR diff. The added skill docs scaffold demo apps into gitignored tmp/ and do not introduce an automatic CI, deployment, secret-handling, or chain-runtime execution path.

---

🔍 AI Review — Auditor (domain review)

VERDICT: 👍

Gittensor UNKNOWN; established contributor with repo write permission and substantial prior subtensor PR history; no overlapping open PRs reported.

The Auditor proposed a replacement PR description, but the current body is non-trivial; not overwriting. Maintainers: ask the Auditor to regenerate if you want it.

This PR adds markdown-only feature-demo skill instructions under .agents/skills/feature-demo/ and mirrors the same content under .claude/skills/feature-demo/. It does not touch runtime, pallets, Cargo manifests, workflow files, or build scripts, so no spec version bump or runtime test is required.

Duplicate-work check: no overlapping open PRs were reported. Auto-fix: not needed; git diff --check passed. I did not run Rust or npm builds because the diff only adds skill documentation.

Findings

No findings.

Conclusion

The added skill documentation is internally consistent across the .agents and .claude trees and keeps generated demo projects under gitignored tmp/. I found no domain issue that should block merge.

[github-actions]

🔄 AI review updated — Skeptic: SAFE Auditor: 👍

[github-actions]

🔄 AI review updated — Skeptic: SAFE Auditor: 👍