test: guard kernel architecture boundaries - #204
Conversation
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codex automated review
Verdict: patch is incorrect
Confidence: 0.96
The new import parser does not cover a legal, gofmt-preserved Go import form, so the migration guard can silently miss a real production consumer. Model-level verification is not recommended because this patch changes repository checks and CI rather than control-state semantics.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codex automated review
Verdict: patch is incorrect
Confidence: 0.98
The new architecture guard misses a valid Go import form, so a forbidden kernel dependency can be committed while CI remains green. Model-level verification is not recommended; a parser regression test is sufficient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codex automated review
Verdict: patch is incorrect
Confidence: 0.99
The CI workflow rename disconnects the existing automatic release trigger, blocking release publication. Model-level verification is not recommended; the failure is deterministic and directly established by the workflow configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Codex automated review
Verdict: patch is correct
Confidence: 0.93
No actionable defect was established. The CI rename remains aligned with the automatic-release trigger, and the added architecture/race checks do not change runtime control behavior. Model-level verification is not recommended before merge.
Summary
Boundary conformance
Verification
python3 -m unittest discover -s .github/tests -p 'test_*.py' -q(35 tests, one expected T5 failure)go test -race ./...go test -race ./kernel ./internal/softwaredelivery/effectsgo vet ./...go build ./...git diff --check