Skip to content

ci: avoid duplicate checks on pull requests - #4

Open
lemarier wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
david/avoid-duplicate-ci
Open

lemarier wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
david/avoid-duplicate-ci

Conversation

@lemarier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updating a same-repository PR currently starts a push run and a pull-request run of each CI workflow. Restrict push checks to main so PR updates run once, with a fresh check after merge. Job names, permissions, and existing manual triggers are preserved.

Validation: actionlint 1.7.12 and checks for PR, main-push, feature-branch-push, and manual-trigger behavior passed. just check reproduces the existing C-02 mounting-hole keep-out failures, already present on main and tracked in #1.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 11, 2026 21:19

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-11T21:20:39.620759Z e0e390f PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants