Skip to content

fix(android): skip explicit Kotlin plugin when AGP registers the kotlin extension - #56

Open
gabrieldonadel wants to merge 1 commit into
phantom:masterfrom
gabrieldonadel:fix/agp9-built-in-kotlin
Open

fix(android): skip explicit Kotlin plugin when AGP registers the kotlin extension#56
gabrieldonadel wants to merge 1 commit into
phantom:masterfrom
gabrieldonadel:fix/agp9-built-in-kotlin

Conversation

@gabrieldonadel

@gabrieldonadel gabrieldonadel commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Problem

Android Gradle Plugin 9 ships built-in Kotlin support and enables it by default, so
AGP registers the kotlin extension itself. When a library also applies kotlin-android
explicitly, the two collide and configuration fails before anything compiles. AGP
words it two ways, both the same problem:

> Failed to apply plugin 'kotlin-android'.
   > Cannot add extension with name 'kotlin', as there is an extension already registered with that name.
> The 'kotlin-android' plugin is no longer required for Kotlin support since AGP 9.0.

The apply is unconditional in this module, so on an AGP 9 project this cannot be built
at all. There is no consumer-side workaround short of patching the file — setting
android.builtInKotlin=false project-wide just to build one dependency is not a
reasonable ask, and that escape hatch is removed in AGP 10.

Change

Apply the plugin only when nothing has registered the kotlin extension yet:

if (project.extensions.findByName('kotlin') == null) {
    apply plugin: 'kotlin-android'
}

Files changed:

  • android/build.gradle

This tests the condition that actually fails, so there is no AGP version table to
keep in sync, and it covers AGP 10 — where the android.builtInKotlin opt-out is
removed — without a special case.

AGP android.builtInKotlin kotlin extension explicit apply
8.x unset or false absent yes (unchanged)
9.x unset or true registered by AGP no
9.x false absent yes
10+ n/a (removed) registered by AGP no

The guard sits after apply plugin: 'com.android.library' in every file it touches,
so AGP has already registered its extensions by the time it runs. I checked that
ordering per file rather than assuming it.

What I verified, and what I did not

  • Verified end to end on a real Expo SDK 58 / React Native 0.87 project with AGP
    9.2.1 and Gradle 9.4.1: :app:assembleDebug succeeds both with
    -Pandroid.newDsl=true -Pandroid.builtInKotlin=true and with both flags off.
  • Confirmed both branches actually execute rather than one path always winning: with
    the flags off, compileDebugKotlin runs from the explicitly applied plugin; with
    them on the build completes without it.
  • Every changed file passes a Groovy Phases.CONVERSION syntax check.
  • Not run: this repo's own CI or example app.

Where this came from

A sweep of 500 popular React Native libraries against the AGP 9 defaults. 152 failed
with the new DSL enabled, and 144 of those failed on exactly this collision — by
far the most common blocker. Affects @phantom/react-native-webview here.

The same guard shape was accepted in
RevenueCat/react-native-purchases#1934,
at that maintainer's suggestion.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Compatibility
    • Improved Android build compatibility with projects using Android Gradle Plugin 9’s built-in Kotlin integration.
    • Retained support for configurations that require the Kotlin plugin to be applied separately.

…in extension

AGP 9 ships built-in Kotlin support and registers the kotlin extension
itself. Applying the Kotlin plugin again fails configuration with
"Cannot add extension with name 'kotlin'". Check for the extension
directly, which needs no AGP version table and covers AGP 10, where the
android.builtInKotlin opt-out is removed.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Essentials

Run ID: c2bd7d36-f514-4690-be0f-174069827180

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ebd8509 and 368e5d0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • android/build.gradle

Included review availability: 3 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 5 reviews per hour.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Android build now skips kotlin-android when a kotlin extension already exists. It continues to apply the plugin for configurations without that extension.

Changes

Kotlin plugin compatibility

Layer / File(s) Summary
Conditional Kotlin plugin application
android/build.gradle
The build checks for the kotlin extension before applying kotlin-android.

Suggested reviewers: jamonholmgren, titozzz

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 368e5

The Android build now avoids applying Kotlin support twice while retaining the existing plugin behavior where Kotlin is not already available. No current merge-blocking risk remains.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: skipping the explicit Kotlin plugin when AGP registers the kotlin extension.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Warning

Your free Security trial is over. An organization admin can upgrade to Advanced for continuous pull request security review or dismiss this notice.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant