-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
Fix static p5 vector method #8998
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Ayush4958
wants to merge
8
commits into
processing:main
Choose a base branch
from
Ayush4958:fix-static-p5-vector-method
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+18
−3
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7366467
added new unit test suite
Ayush4958 c7d2585
fixes static p5 vector menthod
Ayush4958 e09e6f7
Merge branch 'main' into fix-static-p5-vector-method
perminder-17 3a8c162
Merge branch 'main' into fix-static-p5-vector-method
Ayush4958 9cda3f6
Merge branch 'main' into fix-static-p5-vector-method
Ayush4958 aafdfca
Merge branch 'main' into fix-static-p5-vector-method
Ayush4958 723bb67
fix: correct _friendlyError scope in instance methods and fix values …
Ayush4958 e371804
small fix
Ayush4958 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here we are defining the fes in the vector class and here p5._firendlyError is a global static.
What if we don't do this and everywhere in this file wherever
this._friendlyErroris called we replace it withp5._friendlyErrorit should work the same and could look a little cleaner?It's similar to how
setHeading()is in this file (line no. 2028)?what you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah, It works perfectly fine in codebase, cleaniness could be maintained and we dont have to create its duplicate method.
I could apply those changes, share ur thoughts on that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please do @Ayush4958 thanks!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ksen0 @perminder-17
I was trying to implement planned changes in code, but it's throwing rerference p5 is not defined.
because vector sits above that wrapper, any code inside the class methods that tries to say p5._friendlyError will crash the entire library because p5 doesn't exist in that context.
we can go with the implementation I had proposed in PR