Repository navigation
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Don Yin <Don_Yin@outlook.com>
Contributor
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot. |
Author
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I reproduced the small table in #5198: with quad corrections disabled,
0.74became'0 74\n.'. I saw this in default mode too: the existing'33043530\n, .'expectation became'330,435.30'.I used extraction flags to get font-metric boxes for character grouping, without changing the global quad setting. I kept the existing accurate TextPage for layout. I added a rotated-table regression and corrected existing expectations that contained displaced punctuation. I left the separate extra-column issue unchanged.
I ran
pytest tests: lite passed; the full distribution had onlytest_4392failing, which also fails on unmodified main. The table suite passed with layout alone and with layout + 4llm.Refs #5198.