Clarify that strict mode enables selected optional error checking flags - #22058
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #22057
The
confval::strictdescription indocs/source/config_file.rstclaimedthat strict mode enables "all optional error checking flags", but several
optional flags (e.g.
--enable-error-code=ignore-without-code) are not partof strict mode. This changes the wording to "selected optional error checking
flags", as suggested in the issue; the follow-up sentence noting that the
exact list may change over time already covered the imprecision partially.
Docs-only change, no code or behaviour affected.